Distance Travelled by B After Circumnavigating A: 2\pi r

  • Thread starter Thread starter MeJennifer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ratio
MeJennifer
Messages
2,008
Reaction score
6
Observer A and B and a far away star are at rest with respect to each other, A and B are removed r meters from each other. B instantly starts to circumnavigate A and is making sure he is keeping a constant distance r from A. After one complete circumnavigation (he is using the star as a reference) he is looking at his odometer.

Does his meter show 2\pi r?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
..if he's far away from any star/mass, then isn't the answer yes? At least assuming the angular velocity is low? But how do you implement an odometer in empty space?
 
Well the presence of a distant star would allow A to navigate to a high degree of precision. If A and B's masses are small there should be no classical correction for gravity. If A's velocity is small there should be no SR corrections. If there are no nearby significant masses there should be no GR corrections.

And I assume A and B are large enough that there'd be no quantum corrections necessary.:biggrin:

I'd have to say yes, 2 pi r is the odometer reading. But then I'm only a chemist...
 
cesiumfrog said:
But how do you implement an odometer in empty space?
In the case of a "static solution" like the Schwarzschild spacetime, can't you do something like suspending a tape measure along the route the ship takes, and mark it in such a way that in the local inertial rest frame of a freefalling observer passing next to a given small section and instantaneously at rest with respect to it, the marks on that section are the correct distance apart?
 
Last edited:
MeJennifer said:
Observer A and B and a far away star are at rest with respect to each other, A and B are removed r meters from each other. B instantly starts to circumnavigate A and is making sure he is keeping a constant distance r from A. After one complete circumnavigation (he is using the star as a reference) he is looking at his odometer.

Does his meter show 2\pi r?

In the limit, as r->0, he will read 2 \pi r, but for large r he may read something different.

The plane through A may have some non-zero Gaussian curvature.The formula in Wiki http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curvature
(I haven't double checked this with my textbooks) gives

<br /> K = \lim_{r \rightarrow 0} (2 \pi r - \mbox{C}(r)) \cdot \frac{3}{\pi r^3}<br />

The existence of this limit implies that

<br /> \lim_{r \rightarrow 0} (2 \pi r - \mbox{C}(r))} = 0
 
Last edited:
If the circumnavigation is an orbit, and
1) if A is much more massive than B, then the odometer will read 2*pi*r.
2) if A and B are the same mass, the odometer will read pi*r.
3) if A is much less massive than B, the odometer will read zero.
 
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...

Similar threads

Back
Top