Distinguishing 1st/2nd Order Phase Transformations in Crystals

marie2010
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
hi,
can someone explain to me how to distinguish (experimentally or theoretically) between 1st or 2nd (3rd?) order phase transformation in crystal structures.
Thank you in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A first order phase transition involves a release (or intake) of latent heat. A second order transition does not.

There are no third or high order transitions. The name comes from a classification scheme by Ehrenfest that was in error. Though the terminology has stuck around, better names would be discontinuous transitions (which are "first order") and continuous transitions (which are "second order").

In a discontinuous transition the order parameter becomes zero discontinuously at the critical point, whereas in a continuous transition the order parameter changes to zero continuously up to the critical point, and then remains zero afterwards. An order parameter, in case you are unaware of the terminology, is a measurable quantity which is zero in one phase of the material (the 'disordered' phase) and is non-zero in the other phase (the 'ordered' phase).

An example of an order parameter is magnetization in a magnet. At H = 0, there is a continuous transition from a ferromagnetic state (a net fraction of spins are aligned) to a paramagnetic state (M = 0) at a transition temperature Tc as T is increased. At H nonzero, but T less than Tc, the sign of M is equal to the sign of H (but the magnitudes are unrelated). If you flip the sign of H, M will change discontinuously.

Similar considerations will apply to crystal phase transitions.
 
Last edited:
Thank you for your great explanation. It really helps.
 
hi,
I still want to ask you the following: are only the 2nd order transitions reversible? What about the 1st order? I am trying to get some physical feel for how to distinguish between the transition orders and their significance, i.e. why is it important to know whether the transition was 1st or 2nd order?
Thanks in advance.
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Back
Top