Distinguishing between eigenstates

  • Thread starter Thread starter james477
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Eigenstates
james477
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hi, i am having trouble understanding a section of a QM course concerning degenerate eigenstates.

Suppose that some operator B is compatible with A (so A and B have a common eigenbasis). My notes say that this means that some r and r+pi/2 give eigenstates of both A and B in the form |a(r)> = (cos(r)|a1> + sin(r)|a2>) where |a1> and |a2> are two orthogonal degenerate eigenstates of A. I don't understand why the eigenstates have this form?

It goes on to say that in order to find the appropriate value of r we must solve for the eigenvectors of:

<a1|B|a1> <a1|B|a2>
<a2|B|a1> <a2|B|a2>

I don't understand this either... what is the significance of the eigenvectors of this matrix? (i believe the eigenvalues are the quantised measurables of B)

Any help would really be appreciated, Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So the idea with degenerate states is that when an operator A is said to be degenerate means that for a particular eigenvalue the corresponding eigenspace has a dimension larger than one. For simplicity we take this dimension to be two.

This means that when we construct an eigenbasis for A, there will always be two eigenvectors of this basis which share the same eigenvalue, i.e.

A|\lambda_1\rangle = A|\lambda_2\rangle = \lambda|\lambda_1\rangle

Note that |\lambda_1\rangle en |\lambda_2\rangle are linearly independent. Also, we may choose any linear combination of these two vectors and we still end up with an eigenvector of A:

|\lambda_3\rangle = a|\lambda_1\rangle + b |\lambda_2\rangle \Longrightarrow A|\lambda_3\rangle = \lambda|\lambda_3\rangle

What is important to realize is that there does not exist a natural basis for A within this degenerate eigenspace. Any two linearly independent eigenvectors will do.

So, now we get to the second point. Suppose we have a second operator B, which commutes with A (i.e. they are compatible). This means that there exists an eigenbasis of B which is also an eigenbasis of A. However, it is in general not true that any eigenbasis of A is also an eigenbasis for B. The reason for this is that the degenerate eigenspace of A might not be degenerate for B. In that case the operator B "distinguishes" among these eigenvectors of A.

So: B|\lambda_1\rangle \neq B|\lambda_2\rangle

In fact, the eigenvectors of A |\lambda_1\rangle and |\lambda_2\rangle will in general not even be eigenvectors of B (remember: any linear combination of these two eigenvectors is also an eigenvector of A). So the aim is now to find a new set of states |\lambda_1&#039;\rangle and |\lambda_2&#039;\rangle which also form an eigenbasis of B. By looking for the eigenvalues of the matrix you wrote down you are precisely determining that. Namely, these eigenvalues correspond to two eigenvectors. And these eigenvectors in turn diagonalize this matrix.

In other words, we need to find the basis |\lambda_1&#039;\rangle and |\lambda_2&#039;\rangle such that we have:

\left(<br /> \begin{matrix}<br /> \langle\lambda_1&#039;|B|\lambda_1&#039;\rangle &amp; \langle\lambda_1&#039;|B|\lambda_2&#039;\rangle\\<br /> \langle\lambda_2&#039;|B|\lambda_1&#039;\rangle &amp; \langle\lambda_2&#039;|B|\lambda_2&#039;\rangle<br /> \end{matrix}\right) = \left(<br /> \begin{matrix}<br /> \lambda_1&#039; &amp; 0\\<br /> 0 &amp; \lambda_2&#039;<br /> \end{matrix}\right)<br />

If the matrix is of this form, then B is diagonal, which is precisely what we want.
 
Thanks, that's much clearer :)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top