Distribution Function: Computing P(X-Y > a) w/ f(m,v)

Rane3
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I've computed a distribution function f(m,v) by taking partials of P(X<m, Y<v) with respect to m, v. Suppose I wanted the distribution function for P(X-Y > a). Since I know f(m,v), can I use that to help me compute my new distribution function by taking partials? If so, how? I'm a little confused about this. Any good resources/references?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You mean you have a density function f(m,v) - the (joint) distribution function
would be F(m,v) = P(X &lt; m, Y &lt; v).

I'm not sure which of the following two items you want for your second question:

i) You want a specific calculation of P(X - Y &gt; a) for a given value of a. In this case you calculate this double integral

<br /> \iint_{\{X-Y &gt; a\}} f(x,y) \, dx dy<br />

ii) You want an expression for the distribution of the random variable Z = X - Y.
You can either work out it out as an integral:

<br /> P(Z \le z) = \iint_{\{X-Y \le z\}} f(x,y) \, dx dy<br />

or you can do a transformation of variables approach.
 
I am looking for the second description, although I just want the probability density. If I know that:
X>0
X-Y>Z
and I know f(x,y), how can I find the density for X-Y>Z by taking partial derivatives of the integral? I'm getting myself confused. Should it again be partials with respect to Y,X, like I used to find f(x,y) in the first place? It seems that when I setup my limits, there is no dependence on Y and that throws me off.
\int_{-\infty}^{X}\int_0^{X-z}f(x,y)dydx Is this even the correct integral?
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top