B Distribution of energy in the electric field surrounding an electron

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the energy distribution in the electric field surrounding a lone electron in a vacuum. It is established that the energy density of the electric field is not uniform and decreases with distance from the electron, following the formula u = (1/2)ε₀E², where E is the electric field strength. The energy contained within concentric shells around the electron can be calculated using calculus, revealing that energy density drops off as the inverse fourth power of the distance from the electron. The average energy density can be determined by integrating the energy over a volume, but care must be taken not to set the inner radius to zero. Overall, the energy distribution is geometrically and mathematically defined by the spatial relationship to the electron.
Herbascious J
Messages
165
Reaction score
7
TL;DR Summary
How is the energy distributed geometrically/spacially in the electric field surrounding an electron?
I am thinking about how an electric field has energy associated with it. If a single electron exists alone in a remote vaccuum, I believe it has it's own electric field surrounding it, and that this field has an energy content associated with it. My question is; does this electric field store energy in it in a geometrical/spacial way? for example, it I 'slice up' the space around the electron into concentric shells, like an onion, is the energy of the electric field stored in each concentric shell in some mathematical way? Is there a gradient in each shell where there is less and less energy and therefore less and less overall electric field by volume somehow? I am specifically trying to understand the distribution of the energy through out the field in a geometrical/spacial way. Any interpretation of this question is welcome. Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Energy is distributed in the space surrounding the electron. The energy density function (energy per unit volume) is given by ##u=\frac{1}{2}\epsilon_0E^2## where ##E## is the magnitude of the electric field. It is given by ##E=\dfrac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0r^2}~##where ##e## is the charge of the electron. For example, the electrostatic energy contained within a shell of inner radius ##R_1## and outer radius ##R_2## with the electron at its center is given by $$U=\int u~dV=\frac{1}{2}\epsilon_0\int_{R_1}^{R_2}\left( \frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0r^2}\right)^24\pi r^2~dr=\frac{e^2}{8\pi\epsilon_0}\left(\frac{1}{R_1}-\frac{1}{R_2}\right).$$Note that the energy density is not uniform but depends on the distance ##r## from the center and decreases as one goes farther from it.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and Herbascious J
Herbascious J said:
Thank you for the formula. I apologize for my weakness with calculus...the way I'm understanding it is that the energy density (energy/volume, I'm assuming this is like an average) is defined by the distance from the source. So, a shell with outer radius 10 and inner radius 9 would have an average density proportional to [1/10 - 1/9] = 0.011. Alternatively the volume from R=0 to R=1 would have an average density proportional to 1. Again I apologize for being a bit choppy with the math, but is it safe to say that the density is dropping off by the invesrse of the square of the distance? For example, if I move away from the source by 10x, then the density of energy in that region is 100x less dense, etc?
It is better to think of energy density as analogous to mass density not as an average. If the density is uniform, i.e. the same everywhere, then you can say that mass (or energy) is density times volume. If it is not uniform, then you have to use calculus.

If you must have an average density, then you have to calculate it correctly. The average density is given by

##u_{\text{avg.}}=\dfrac{\text{Total energy contained in a volume}}{\text{The volume}}.~##In this example the average density would be $$u_{\text{avg.}}=\frac{\frac{e^2}{8\pi\epsilon_0}\left(\frac{1}{R_1}-\frac{1}{R_2}\right)}{\frac{4}{3}\pi(R_2^3-R_1^3)}.$$ Also note that you cannot set ##R_1## equal to zero, because it is in the denominator and ##\dfrac{1}{0}## is undefined, it is not zero as you seem to think.

Finally, the energy density goes as the inverse fourth power of the distance from the center (##\sim\frac{1}{r^4}##) because the electric field is inversely proportional to the square of the distance and the density is proportional to the field squared.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and Herbascious J
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top