Div, grad and curl in cylindrical polar coordinates

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the divergence, gradient, and curl of a scalar field in cylindrical polar coordinates. The scalar field is given as φ = U(R + a²/R)cos(θ) + kθ, where U, a, and k are constants. The user initially misapplies the concepts, mistakenly calculating the curl and divergence of a scalar field instead of the gradient. It is clarified that the curl of the gradient is always zero, while the divergence is not identically zero. The user is encouraged to review their methodology for accuracy and correctness in their calculations.
maggie56
Messages
26
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Hi,
i am trying to find the div, grad and curl in cylindrical polar coordinates for the scalar field
\ phi = U(R+a^2/R)cos(theta) + k*theta for cylindrical polar coordinates (R,theta,z)
I have attempted all three and would really appreciate it if someone could tell me if the answers look ok as I am really not sure whether i have correctly followed the method
Thank you
Sorry i forgot to put that its the curl of the gradient and divergence of the gradient that I am finding. I guess i have a non zero answer for curl of gradient because U,a and k are constants so my answer would be zero for certain U,a,k.

Homework Equations



\ phi = U(R+a^2/R)cos(theta) + k*theta U,a,k constants


The Attempt at a Solution



For gradient of phi \ U(1-a^2/R^2)cos(theta) R'hat' - \[ U(1+a^2/R^2)sin(theta) + k/R]
theta'hat'

Curl of phi \ sin(theta)(2Ua^2/R^4 + U/R - a^2/R^3) - k/R^3 z'hat'



divergence of phi is zero
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The gradient is correct, but the curl and divergence aren't. You can't take the curl and divergence of a scalar field.
 
Sorry its the curl of the gradient and the divergence of the gradient.
i know that the curl of the gradient is always zero?
 
Right, the curl is 0. Mathematica gave me a different result for the divergence, though. (I think you swapped "curl" and "divergence" in the original post. Or maybe not. Either way, they're both incorrect.)
 
I have looked at the curl and divergence again. u is the gradient of phi.

u = \ U(1-a^2/R^2)cos(theta) R'hat' - \[ U(1+a^2/R^2)sin(theta) + k/R] theta'hat'

so curl of u is
\ [U/R -a^2U/R^3 - 2a^2U/R^4)sin(theta) - k/R^3 z'hat'

divergence of u is 0

Do these answers look better? since U,a and k are constants i have an expression for the curl of the gradient but this could be zero for certain U,a and k.
 
No, the curl of the gradient is 0 for all U, a, and k, and the divergence is not identically 0.

Show your work.
 
my working
for the curl of the gradient

\ 1/R [ 0<b>R&#039;hat&#039;</b> + 0 <b>theta&#039;hat&#039;</b> + -2Ua^2/R^3 sin(theta) - k/R^2 + U(1-a^2/R^2 sin(theta) ]

= \ sin(theta)(-2Ua^2/R^4 + U/R - a^2/R^3) - k/R^3
 
my matrix for the curl is

R'hat' Theta'hat' Z'hat on top line
d/dR d/dtheta d/dz on middle line
\ U(1-a^2/R^2)cos(theta) \ -U(1+a^2/R^2)sin(theta)+k/R 0 on bottom line

with a 1/R on the outside
the -U is in the middle column and zero is for z column
 

Similar threads

Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K