Divergence in Polar Coordinates

neutrino2063
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Why is
[tex]\nabla\cdot\vec{A}=\frac{1}{r}\frac{\partial}{\partial r}(rA_{r})+\frac{1}{r}\frac{\partial}{\partial \theta}(A_{\theta})[/tex]

Where
[tex]\vec{A}=A_{r}\hat{r}+A_{\theta}\hat{\theta}[/tex]
And
[tex]\nabla=\hat{r}\frac{\partial}{\partial r}+\hat{\theta}\frac{1}{r}\frac{\partial}{\partial \theta}[/tex]
Instead of just:

[tex]\nabla\cdot\vec{A}=\frac{\partial}{\partial r}(A_{r})+\frac{1}{r}\frac{\partial}{\partial \theta}(A_{\theta})[/tex]
 
Last edited:
Because the unit vectors are actually functions of position in cylindrical coordinates. This means all the derivative in the gradient operator act not only on the components of a particular vector, but also the unit vectors themselves.
 

Similar threads

Replies
33
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K