Divergence of ##\vec{x}/\vert\vec{x}\vert^3##

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The divergence of the vector field ##\vec{F} = \frac{\vec{x}}{\vert\vec{x}\vert^3}## over ##\mathbb{R}^3## is calculated to be zero, indicating that the field is solenoidal. The confusion arises from the physical interpretation of this result, particularly regarding the behavior at the origin where the field is undefined due to division by zero. The consensus among participants is that the origin should be excluded from consideration, as it does not represent a source or sink of the field. Thus, the divergence being zero is consistent with the nature of the field.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector calculus, specifically divergence.
  • Familiarity with electric fields and point charges.
  • Knowledge of the mathematical representation of vector fields.
  • Experience with GeoGebra or similar graphing tools for visualizing vector fields.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of solenoidal vector fields and their implications in physics.
  • Learn about the mathematical treatment of singularities in vector fields.
  • Explore the concept of divergence in the context of Maxwell's equations.
  • Investigate the behavior of vector fields near singular points and their physical interpretations.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on electromagnetism, vector calculus, and mathematical physics. This discussion is beneficial for anyone seeking to understand the implications of divergence in vector fields and the treatment of singularities.

PhysicsRock
Messages
121
Reaction score
19
Homework Statement
Calculate ##\displaystyle \frac{\partial}{\partial x_i} \frac{x_i}{\vert\vec{x}\vert^3}##
Relevant Equations
##\nabla \cdot \vec{F} = \sum_i \frac{\partial f_i}{\partial x_i}##
As you can see in the homework statement, I am asked to calculate what's effectively the divergence of the vector field ##\vec{F} = \vec{x}/\vert\vec{x}\vert^3## over ##\mathbb{R}^3##. I have done that, the calculation itself isn't that difficult after all. However, I can't make sense of the result, which makes me wonder whether I've made a mistake. What I find is that ##\nabla \cdot \vec{F} = 0##. I used GeoGebra to plot the field, and what I see is vectors "coming out" of the origin. Is it as simple as to say that, since you can't divide by 0, the origin isn't part of the field, and thus, there is no particular source? Or have I made a mistake in my calculations and the result isn't 0?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
See this thread
Lambda96 said:
Homework Statement: Calculate the following ##\vec{\nabla}\cdot \vec{E}(\vec{r})##
Relevant Equations: none

Hi,

unfortunately, I am not sure if I have calculated the task correctly

View attachment 325180
The electric field of a point charge looks like this ##\vec{E}(\vec{r})=\frac{Q}{4 \pi \epsilon_0}\frac{\vec{r}}{|\vec{r}|^3}## I have now simply divided the electric field into its components i.e. #E_x , E-y, E_z#.

$$\vec{E}(\vec{r})=\frac{Q}{4 \pi \epsilon_0}\left( \begin{array}{rrr}
\frac{x}{(x^2+y^2+z^3)^{\frac{3}{2}}} \\
\frac{y}{(x^2+y^2+z^3)^{\frac{3}{2}}} \\
\frac{z}{(x^2+y^2+z^3)^{\frac{3}{2}}} \\
\end{array}\right)$$

Then I calculated the divergence

$$\vec{\nabla}\cdot \vec{E}(\vec{r})=\frac{Q}{4 \pi \epsilon_0} \Bigl( \frac{\partial}{\partial x}\frac{x}{(x^2+y^2+z^2)^{\frac{3}{2} }} +\frac{\partial}{\partial y}\frac{y}{(x^2+y^2+z^2)^{\frac{3}{2} }} +\frac{\partial}{\partial z}\frac{z}{(x^2+y^2+z^2)^{\frac{3}{2} }} \Bigr)=\Bigl( \frac{-2x^2+y^2+z^2}{(x^2+y^2+z^2)^{\frac{5}{2} }} +\frac{x^2-2y^2+z^2}{(x^2+y^2+z^2)^{\frac{5}{2} }} +\frac{x^2+y^2-2z^2}{(x^2+y^2+z^2)^{\frac{5}{2} }} \Bigr)=0$$

With the result of 0 I am a bit confused, in the task is not mentioned the sign of the charge, but with a positive charge I would expect as a divergence a source, so the divergence would have to be positive and with a negative charge, a sink, so a negative divergence.

Have I somehow miscalculated, or do I have a thinking error in the physical interpretation of the result?
 
The vector field is indeed solenoidal, without divergence. All vector fields of type ##\dfrac{\vec{c}\times \vec{r}}{\|\vec{r}\|^3}## are.

PhysicsRock said:
Is it as simple as to say that, since you can't divide by 0, the origin isn't part of the field, and thus, there is no particular source? Or have I made a mistake in my calculations and the result isn't 0?

We always have a ball of some positive radius and vectors pointing outward of equal length. You could as well say that there is no way to lose or gain energy on a closed path through that field.
 
PhysicsRock said:
I am asked to calculate what's effectively the divergence of the vector field ##\vec{F} = \vec{x}/\vert\vec{x}\vert^3## over ##\mathbb{R}^3##.
I think that the origin should be omitted.
PhysicsRock said:
Is it as simple as to say that, since you can't divide by 0, the origin isn't part of the field, and thus, there is no particular source?
IMO, you are correct. The initial statement of the problem seems a little careless by including the origin.
I would like to hear the opinion on this of others who have more expertise.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PhysicsRock

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K