Diverging and converging infinite series

eptheta
Messages
64
Reaction score
0
I looked through some tutorials to find intervals of divergence and tests for divergence...
My series:
[PLAIN]http://img843.imageshack.us/img843/4193/51453212.jpg
a and x are constants...
I did the ratio test and i get \rho=1, so i tried to apply the limit test to see if an is zero or does not exist... The problem is, i am not sure about my method...
Do i divide the numerator(1) by n also, if so, the test gives an=0... But then again i am not sure...
I learned about these tests from http://www.math.unh.edu/~jjp/radius/radius.html"...

Could someone please tell me if this sum is convergent or divergent (and the method you used to find this out)

Thanks
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Take x outside the summation. The terms in the sum behave like 1/n for large n. This series is well known divergent. The sum behaves like ln(n).
 
That makes sense, thanks.. I have one more question...

I was fiddling with my calculator and typed "Ans-(Ans-\sqrt{Ans}-2)" and kept clicking =...(The expression is in the same form as xn - f(x)/f'(x) but is just equal to \sqrt{Ans}+2...
I found that it converges as 4. It seemed logical enough...But then i decided to form the equation that represents f(x)...

so basically, what i got out of the expression is that y/(dy/dx)=x-\sqrt{x}-2
dy/y=dx/(x-\sqrt{x}-2)
Integrating(painfully), ln y=k(x-\sqrt{x}-2)(\sqrt{x}-2/\sqrt{x}+2)1/3

Its root x -2 in the numerator not root 3 -2...

Where k is a constant... I should have tried with something simpler, but is this the correct way to form an approximation of a function that converges using Newton's method (or am i just being an oaf)
If it is the former, then how do i find k.
If it is the latter, then how do i find f(x) for :
[PLAIN]http://img714.imageshack.us/img714/5351/96407726.png

Thanks.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sorry, it is not summation to infinity, but rather term at infinity for the last expression.
-Thanks
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top