Divide by Zero: Lorentz Transformation Explained

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dropout
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Zero
Dropout
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
Lorentz transformation shows that at the speed of light you divide by zero.

Photons travel at the speed of light, but it isn't matter, but should that matter, matter of fact?

Does this line of thinking lead anywhere, or should I terminate this world-line?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"world-line"?
This thinking is good to note, but i don't think its going to lead anywhere. Kudos tho.
You really can't divide by zero... you can say that as something approaches the speed of light, the Lorentz factor diverges (approaches infinity).
The lorentz transformation equations don't really apply to light itself, or any gauge boson for that matter. Its just not really a valid to apply the equation to things actually traveling at the speed of light.
Cheers.
 

Thread 'Describing the Big Bang'

I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
View full post »
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'

Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'

See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
View full post »

Thread 'A sufficient condition for integrability of equation ##\nabla g=0##'

In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Distance between two light pulses
Replies
4
Views
1K
I Question about full Lorentz transformation
3
Replies
101
Views
6K
B Photon Frequency: How Special Relativity Affects Light
Replies
23
Views
3K
B Transfer speeds of forces affected by time dilation?
Replies
18
Views
2K
A Show Lagrangian is invariant under a Lorentz transformation without using generators
Replies
3
Views
1K
I Does SR Length Contraction Halve Space Travel Time?
Replies
17
Views
2K
I EM Faraday tensor transformation for conductor carrying current
Replies
9
Views
1K
I How do non-diagonal indices of a metric allow for local flatness?
Replies
22
Views
365
I Coordinate and time transformations
Replies
5
Views
2K
I Does Lorentz invariance imply Einstein's synchronization convention?
Replies
32
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top