In post #7 of https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=532666" thread, the OP asked whether one could meaningfully divide by a matrix. Certainly this is possible for invertible matrices, but I'm wondering if it's possible to define something similar even for singular matrices.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

For instance, suppose I have a singular matrix [itex] A [/itex]. If [itex] B = \lambda A [/itex], it seems natural to define [itex] \frac{B}{A} := \lambda I [/itex]. However, I don't think this operation is well-defined. Since [itex]A[/itex] is singular, left multiplication by [itex]A[/itex] has a nontrivial kernel, so there is some nonzero vector [itex] v [/itex] such that [itex] Av = 0[/itex]. Letting [itex] V[/itex] be the matrix with columns [itex] v [/itex], then [itex] B = A \cdot \lambda I = A \cdot (\lambda I + V)[/itex], so [itex] \frac{B}{A}[/itex] could just as well be equal to [itex] \lambda I + V[/itex].

My question is, is there a way to make this division well-defined? Would working over a ring with specific properties help?

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Dividing by matrices

Loading...

Similar Threads for Dividing matrices |
---|

A Infinite matrices and the Trace function |

A Diagonalizing Hermitian matrices with adjoint representation |

A Diagonalization of matrices |

I Inverse of the sum of two matrices |

I Adding a matrix and a scalar. |

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**