Originally posted by Nereid
What about DNA in mitochondria? chloroplasts? other thingies in the cell?? Do they have DNA too? (Monique seems to have mentioned only the nucleus).
Yes, there is DNA in the Mitochondria, the Chloroplast, and at the base of FLagella (EG of a flagella = The tail on a sperm cell. That tail is a flagella and is quite common in the cellular world).
The DNA in these things is much less than the DNA in the nucleus, and they generally only express a few genes which are required for those organelles. In essence, the DNA in the Nucleus is the 'store manager', controlling the cell, while the DNA in those few organelles are the department managers, controlling aspects of that section of the cell.
What are the differences between prokaryotes and eukaryotes (in terms of DNA? (lnx990 implied there are significant differences)
The most striking difference is that Eukaryotes (PLants, animals, fungus and some single celled organisms) have their DNA in the Nucleus organelle. Prokaryotes (bacteria) have their DNA just loose in the cytoplasm (it has no compartments like the nucleus).
There are other differences in terms of how DNA is read and stuff, but these get pretty technical, to do with what sequences constitute a start sequences, and whether bits of DNA are cut out of the translated sequence etc... I'm sure we'd be happy to explain this more, but it can be complicated and there is no need to get into it really.
I remember reading that RNA can also make proteins; is RNA also part of the 'book of life'?
Ummmm...Imagine the book of life is in spanish, and RNA is the cells attempt to translate small sections of the book into English. The molecules which turn the genetic code into Proteins can only understand english (RNA).
What happens, is the DNA stores
all of the information, while the cell will trancribe the little sections that it needs into RNA, so that those little bits can be translated in proteins. The RNA is a temporary holder of information, but is not part of the book itself.
IIRC, there've also been some recent discoveries on the importance of the 'junk' stretches of DNA, including some possible roles in the transcription process?
awww..yeah.. i guess. There has been a lot of debate over 'junk' DNA ever since it was found and theorized to be 'junk'. I think the debate is a waste of time. I think it will become more than obvious that some of it will do stuff, and some of it won't. But whatever.