Do AC generators make use of interpoles?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jacob Anderson
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ac Generators
AI Thread Summary
AC generators do not utilize interpoles since they lack a commutator, making neutral plane shift irrelevant. The armature reaction in alternators contributes to their synchronous impedance. Commutation can offer benefits in adjustable output voltage and direction when brushes are on a rotating assembly, potentially useful in applications like diesel-electric locomotives. Aligning all poles in the same orientation may reduce available flux but could also impact performance. For Halbach arrays, aligning magnets transaxially is preferred to ensure uniform crossing of magnetic field lines.
Jacob Anderson
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello, new member here. I'm giving myself a crash course and can't find a direct answer to my query outright, so here I am:

Do A.C. generators make use of interpoles? I understand the concept of interpoles in D.C. machines, offsetting neutral plane shift; however, if we have, say, a brushless ac generator that has an external prime mover and uses permanent magnets in lieu of excitation windings, are we even worried about neutral plane shift? If it's a 3-phase machine my gut says no, but again it's a self-inflicted crash course... Any help would be greatly appreciated!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Your intuition is correct. Without a commutator shift of magnetic field is of no consequence.

Armature reaction in alternators is what's behind their "Synchronous Impedance" .

old jim
 
HUZZAH, thank you. That's been driving me crazy all day.
 
Whilst we're here, is there any particular benefit of commutation over rectification?

Also, going with the pmac concept, would aligning all the poles in the same orientation have a negative effect other than reducing the available flux? Alas, at least for now, my final question: were one to arrange said magnets in halbach arrays, would they need to be aligned with the magnetic fields aligned axially or transaxially? That question is more for clarification, I'm leaning greatly towards transaxial so the coils cross the field lines more uniformly.
 
Jacob Anderson said:
Whilst we're here, is there any particular benefit of commutation over rectification?
The only benefit for commutation would be if the brushes were on a rotating assembly , then you could change the output voltage and even direction by rotating the brush assembly, this would also change the emf constant and torque constant, so it would function like a variable gear ratio. Might be useful for a primitive diesel electric locomotive, where the primer mover was constant speed.?? I think the Ward Lenard set achieved this effect and dominated the variable DC motor control industry from 1900 on Ward Lenard Control
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
10K
Replies
65
Views
10K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top