Do all light waves move at the same speed?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the nature of light waves, specifically whether all light waves move at the same speed and how their oscillatory motion affects measurements of speed. Participants explore concepts related to the wave-particle duality of photons, the behavior of light in different media, and the implications of wave characteristics on speed measurements.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that photons move at the speed of light, while questioning whether the oscillatory motion of the wave affects how speed is measured.
  • Others clarify that light moves in a straight line and that the oscillation pertains to electric and magnetic fields, not the physical movement of light itself.
  • A participant suggests that light may travel in a spiral or corkscrew pattern, linking this to circular polarization, but acknowledges that this does not imply a physical motion in space.
  • There are discussions about the shape of photons, with some arguing that photons cannot be said to have a shape, while others reference wave-particle duality in relation to photon energy.
  • One participant mentions recent articles on 'twisted light' and questions whether this affects the straight-line speed of light.
  • Some participants emphasize that the speed of light is constant in a vacuum but varies in different media, such as glass.
  • There is a contention regarding the meaningfulness of discussing the shape of elementary particles, with some asserting that it is not a valid concept.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of light and photons, with no consensus reached on whether the oscillatory characteristics of light waves impact speed measurements or the concept of photon shape. The discussion remains unresolved on several points, particularly regarding the interpretation of wave-particle duality and the implications of recent findings on light behavior.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include varying interpretations of wave-particle duality, the dependence on definitions of speed in different media, and unresolved questions about the nature of photons and their interactions.

hsdrop
Messages
324
Reaction score
114
I know photons all move at the speed of light and they move in a wave like pattern. So the question is. Do we take into account the up and down motion of the wave when we measure how fast it's moving or do we just measure the forward movement ?? For example, if the wave has higher and lower ups and downs would the wave cover more "ground" than a wave with lower ups and downs in the rate of speed forward? Please be kind with any response and if anyone is confused with what I'm asking I will try to draw out what I'm asking.
and a big thank you ahead of time to anyone that responds.
 
Science news on Phys.org
Light moves in a straight line. What has an oscillation is the electric and magnetic fields. When someone draws light like this
lightwave1.gif

notice that only one of the axes represents space.

In vacuum, the speed on light is constant, whatever the frequency and amplitude of this oscillation.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hsdrop
I was under the idea that light traveled in a spiral, slinky, corkscrew like wave or at least that what I have been able to learn off the net so far...
so the photon travels strate and it gives off electric and magnetic fields with different frequency and amplitude of this oscillation.
am I getting the right idea maybe ??
 
hsdrop said:
I was under the idea that light traveled in a spiral, slinky, corkscrew like wave or at least that what I have been able to learn off the net so far...
That corkscrew picture probably corresponds to circular polarization of light. But there is nothing doing that motion in space.

hsdrop said:
so the photon travels strate and it gives off electric and magnetic fields with different frequency and amplitude of this oscillation.
am I getting the right idea maybe ??
It doesn't "give off" electric and magnetic fields, it has electric and magnetic fields. And you should not thing of light in terms of tiny particles called photons zipping about. You can see it has a wave of electromagnetic ration propagating in space.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Dale and hsdrop
ok maybe I should start out with does a photon have a shape?
 
hsdrop said:
ok maybe I should start out with does a photon have a shape?

This really depends on the photon's energy. All photons have the shape of the picture above. But all photons can also be treated as a particle (and higher energy photons are more particle-like). This is called wave-particle duality and you should read more about it.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hsdrop
hsdrop said:
ok maybe I should start out with does a photon have a shape?

Hercuflea said:
This really depends on the photon's energy. All photons have the shape of the picture above. But all photons can also be treated as a particle (and higher energy photons are more particle-like). This is called wave-particle duality and you should read more about it.

No, you cannot think of a photon as having a shape. It is not a particle in the sense that it is a little ball or some other shape. It is simply a quantized interaction between the EM wave and matter or another EM wave.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hsdrop and Dale
Hercuflea said:
This is called wave-particle duality and you should read more about it.

Wave-particle duality is an outdated concept and you shouldn't get that much into it. And what you wrote about shape of photon is completely not true. There is no meaningful way to talk about shape of elementary particles.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hsdrop
There have been a few articles recently about 'twisted light' - for example:
http://phys.org/news/2016-03-optical-slower.html
I am not sure whether the light here is actually following a curved path or if it is an interference pattern. This article implies that it is actually twisted so its straight line speed is marginally slower.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hsdrop
  • #10
hsdrop said:
I know photons all move at the speed of light and they move in a wave like pattern. So the question is. Do we take into account the up and down motion of the wave when we measure how fast it's moving or do we just measure the forward movement ?? For example, if the wave has higher and lower ups and downs would the wave cover more "ground" than a wave with lower ups and downs in the rate of speed forward?

So the short answer is no because they don't physically "move in a wave like pattern".

I know photons all move at the speed of light

The speed of light is only a constant (c) in a vacuum. The speed of light in glass is about 2/3rds of the speed in a vacuum.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hsdrop
  • #11
Even for waves that really do propagate in a wavelike pattern, you don't take into account the "up and down motion" when working with its speed.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hsdrop
  • #12
Drakkith said:
No, you cannot think of a photon as having a shape. It is not a particle in the sense that it is a little ball or some other shape. It is simply a quantized interaction between the EM wave and matter or another EM wave.
What if the photon doesn't have anything to interact with and is just propagating through space? Would it not be like the picture in post 2?
 
  • #13
Hercuflea said:
What if the photon doesn't have anything to interact with and is just propagating through space? Would it not be like the picture in post 2?
No. However, you've asked a very similar question in another thread: https://www.physicsforums.com/threa...er-interacts-with-matter.894667/#post-5628310
so we should continue the discussion there.

As the question that started this thread has been answered, we can close it.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hsdrop

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
9K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
976
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K