Medical Do Antihistamines Work for All Allergens?

  • Thread starter Thread starter lisab
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the effectiveness of antihistamines in treating allergic reactions, regardless of the specific allergen listed on the packaging. Users note that antihistamines, such as fexofenadine and OTC eye drops, alleviate symptoms even when the trigger (like dust mites) is not explicitly mentioned. The consensus is that antihistamines function by blocking histamine action, which is released during allergic reactions, and this mechanism is not specific to any particular allergen. The conversation also touches on the body's immune response, particularly the role of IgE and mast cells in allergy symptoms, and how antihistamines can vary in their application methods based on the type of allergy. Overall, the effectiveness of antihistamines appears to be more about their action on histamine rather than the specific allergen involved.
lisab
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
2,026
Reaction score
623
I have to use antihistamines regularly - usually fexofenadine, but today I used OTC antihistamine eye drops.

The package insert said the drops were for "pollen, ragweed, grass, and animal hair/dander." I've noticed that most (all?) OTC antihistamines have similar lists of allergens for which you can take the drug.

WRT antihistamines, does it really matter what the trigger was, once the reaction has started?

If I'm having an allergic reaction to dust mites, and I take an antihistamine that does not list dust mites, it seems to work just fine.
 
Biology news on Phys.org
I don't think it should make a difference, antihistamines by their very definition are antagonists of histamine and don't directly deal with whatever is causing the response. Perhaps the label is there because whilst antihistamines are OK for those kind of allergies others may cause worse or varied symptoms and require other treatment.
 
I'm guessing there are a number of physiological mechanisms that lead to the inlfammatory response (couldn't find anything that said there was a common pathway through histamine). I think that histamine is released from mast cells, leading to inflammation. The mast cells release histamine in response to the binding of an allergen to specific IgE receptors. In which case I'm guessing the antihistamines would work regardless of the allergen? Since, as Ryan said, the antihistamines do not directly interact with the allergen. If there are other pathways from allergen to inflammation, then I'm wrong. Anyone have any more details? I'll be studying immunology soon. This is good preparation!
 
Allergic reactions of the kind plaguing you Lisa are http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_I_hypersensitivity" .

First body has to be sensitized to the allergen by B-response helper T cells (Th2s) which do class switching of their Ig production to IgE. On subsequent encounters of the allergen this directly acts on the B cells which cause release of IgE.

Mast cells and basophils have IgE receptors on their surface which bind the IgE and causes deregulation--Namely of histaminergic granules.

The release of histamine is what causes the problems in your body, as most cells have histamine receptors--especially vascular endothelial cells and secretory cells. This is the "fast" phase of reaction which causes those yucky "allergy" symptoms.

In a slower phase, propogated by cytokines, prostoglandins, leukotrines, etc.

The reaction itself isn't specific for a certain type of allergen, rather is a genetic disposition toward a Th2 mediated IgE response.

Antihistamines work by blocking histamines action at cell types. First generation antihistamines had the unfortunate (or fortunate if want to go to bed early!) effect of crossing the blood-brain barrier and acting at cells which regulate our sleep patterns--Causing drowsiness. Newer antihistamines have more specificity and generally are much better at acting on peripheral receptors.

So to directly answer your question--No the allergen itself doesn't matter, its stopping a shared response that the drugs are after.

In some cases the body can be trained or "desensitized" to the Th2-IgE response through repeated small doses of allergens. Though this doesn't work for everyone and there is obviously a great deal of pharmaceutical research in eliciting a specific Th response instead of the other (Th1 vs Th2).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
lisab said:
WRT antihistamines, does it really matter what the trigger was, once the reaction has started?

If I'm having an allergic reaction to dust mites, and I take an antihistamine that does not list dust mites, it seems to work just fine.

There have been some excellent responses already, I just want to add that for the antihistamines the method of application is important and this does relate to the allergen.

E.g. generally speaking the eye drops would work well for pollen exposure, an inhalator for animal dander, a lotion or cream for mosquito bites, a tablet for food-related allergies.

If someone is experiencing a severe peanut allergy it wouldn't make sense to use antihistamine eye drops :wink:
 
Thanks, everyone!
 
https://www.nhs.uk/mental-health/conditions/body-dysmorphia/ Most people have some mild apprehension about their body, such as one thinks their nose is too big, hair too straight or curvy. At the extreme, cases such as this, are difficult to completely understand. https://www.msn.com/en-ca/health/other/why-would-someone-want-to-amputate-healthy-limbs/ar-AA1MrQK7?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=68ce4014b1fe4953b0b4bd22ef471ab9&ei=78 they feel like they're an amputee in the body of a regular person "For...
Thread 'Did they discover another descendant of homo erectus?'
The study provides critical new insights into the African Humid Period, a time between 14,500 and 5,000 years ago when the Sahara desert was a green savanna, rich in water bodies that facilitated human habitation and the spread of pastoralism. Later aridification turned this region into the world's largest desert. Due to the extreme aridity of the region today, DNA preservation is poor, making this pioneering ancient DNA study all the more significant. Genomic analyses reveal that the...
Whenever these opiods are mentioned they usually mention that e.g. fentanyl is "50 times stronger than heroin" and "100 times stronger than morphine". Now it's nitazene which the public is told is everything from "much stronger than heroin" and "200 times stronger than fentany"! Do these numbers make sense at all? How do they arrive at them? Kill thousands of mice? En passant: nitazene have already been found in both Oxycontin pills and in street "heroin" here, so Naloxone is more...

Similar threads

Back
Top