I Do diffeomorphisms have to be one-to-one functions?

Antineutrino
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
The definition of a diffeomorphism involves the differentiable inverse of a function, so must the original function be one-to-one to make its inverse a function, or can the inverse be a relation and not a function?

Sorry if it's a silly question, I am just a second semester calc student who looked at this for fun.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Antineutrino said:
The definition of a diffeomorphism involves the differentiable inverse of a function, so must the original function be one-to-one to make its inverse a function, or can the inverse be a relation and not a function?

Sorry if it's a silly question, I am just a second semester calc student who looked at this for fun.
If a function is not one-to-one, then it has no inverse.
 
Differential geometry is a difficult subject that lacks "easy" pedagogical examples. However, using GNU/Linux tools, as I attempt to demonstrate in my web page, differential geometry can be easily explored so as to attain a thorough understanding of its principles. "A picture is worth a thousand words" is the old adage and it does indeed apply to differential geometry. Please feel free to visit my page and offer a comment: http://lapiet.info/mathphys/diffgeo/diffgeo1/monkey_saddle.html...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
12K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K