I Do diffeomorphisms have to be one-to-one functions?

Antineutrino
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
The definition of a diffeomorphism involves the differentiable inverse of a function, so must the original function be one-to-one to make its inverse a function, or can the inverse be a relation and not a function?

Sorry if it's a silly question, I am just a second semester calc student who looked at this for fun.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Antineutrino said:
The definition of a diffeomorphism involves the differentiable inverse of a function, so must the original function be one-to-one to make its inverse a function, or can the inverse be a relation and not a function?

Sorry if it's a silly question, I am just a second semester calc student who looked at this for fun.
If a function is not one-to-one, then it has no inverse.
 

Similar threads

Replies
69
Views
12K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Back
Top