I Do Different Observers See Different Entangled States in Quantum Mechanics?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Robert Shaw
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Quantum
Robert Shaw
Messages
64
Reaction score
6
Alice and Bob are partial observers of states in a toy quantum Universe and widely discussed in the literature of Quantum Mechanics.

They see some states as separable and others as entangled. For Alice the partial measurement suboperator is diag(1,1,-1,-1) and Bob is diag(1,-1,1,-1).

Martians Ylc and Zog see the world differently. For Ylc adiag(1,1,1,1) and Zog adiag(1,-1,-1,1) ...antidiagonal matrices. Their eigenvectors are the maximally entangled states for Alice and Bob.

A state is prepared which is observed by Alice and Bob to be separable.

Ylc and Zog observe the same state and find it to be entangled.

This inconsistency between earthpersons and martians seems to be allowed in quantum mechanics.

Unless we invoke a rule that earthpersons cannot communicate with martians.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"Quantum theory is a procedure by which scientists predict probabilities that measurements of specified kinds will yield results of specified kinds in situations of specified kinds. It is applied in circumstances that are described by saying that a certain physical system is first prepared in a specified manner and is later examined in a specified manner."

http://www.informationphilosopher.com/solutions/scientists/stapp/Copenhagen_Interpretation.pdf

So, you must first specify how exactly the measurement is performed, on Earth or Mars, and only after that apply any QM.

 
  • Like
Likes Robert Shaw
AlexCaledin said:
"Quantum theory is a procedure by which scientists predict probabilities that measurements of specified kinds will yield results of specified kinds in situations of specified kinds. It is applied in circumstances that are described by saying that a certain physical system is first prepared in a specified manner and is later examined in a specified manner."

http://www.informationphilosopher.com/solutions/scientists/stapp/Copenhagen_Interpretation.pdf

So, you must first specify how exactly the measurement is performed, on Earth or Mars, and only after that apply any QM.

I think I like your answer, but I have doubts that you haven't addressed.

The term "specified manner" sounds reasonable and reassuring but is actually vague.

"I bought it at Aldi" so it's been prepared in a "specific manner".

"I weighed it on my bathroom scales" so it's been measured in a "specified manner".

Specifying the manner of preparation and measurement does not yield good physics.

We need to do more than "specify the manner"...

...but what more do we need!
 
  • Like
Likes AlexCaledin
Robert Shaw said:
For Alice the partial measurement suboperator is diag(1,1,-1,-1) and Bob is diag(1,-1,1,-1).
For Ylc adiag(1,1,1,1) and Zog adiag(1,-1,-1,1) ...antidiagonal matrices. Their eigenvectors are the maximally entangled states for Alice and Bob.
Where did you get this from? Some reference? Some calculation which you can present here?
 
Robert Shaw said:
A state is prepared which is observed by Alice and Bob to be separable.

Ylc and Zog observe the same state and find it to be entangled.

Please show your work. As far as I know this is impossible; whether or not a state is entangled is an invariant property of the state, independent of who is observing it.
 
Robert Shaw said:
Alice and Bob are partial observers of states in a toy quantum Universe and widely discussed in the literature of Quantum Mechanics.

They see some states as separable and others as entangled. For Alice the partial measurement suboperator is diag(1,1,-1,-1) and Bob is diag(1,-1,1,-1).

Martians Ylc and Zog see the world differently. For Ylc adiag(1,1,1,1) and Zog adiag(1,-1,-1,1) ...antidiagonal matrices. Their eigenvectors are the maximally entangled states for Alice and Bob.

A state is prepared which is observed by Alice and Bob to be separable.

Ylc and Zog observe the same state and find it to be entangled.

This inconsistency between earthpersons and martians seems to be allowed in quantum mechanics.

Unless we invoke a rule that earthpersons cannot communicate with martians.

I don't understand exactly what you're claiming here. Can we use the more traditional Dirac notation for entangled states?

If you have two maximally entangled spin-1/2 particles, then they can be described as being in the composite state:

\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} ( |u_z\rangle |d_z\rangle - |d_z\rangle |u_z\rangle)

So that's a superposition of two states:
  1. |u_z\rangle |d_z\rangle, in which the first particle is spin-up in the z-direction, and the other particle is spin-down
  2. |d_z\rangle |u_z\rangle, in which the first particle is spin-down in the z-direction, and the other particle is spin-up
(Choosing any other direction leads to the same composite state, if the total spin is zero)

So what do you mean by saying that it's entangled for the Earthlings, but not the extraterrestrials, or vice-versa?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top