Do Different Observers See Different Entangled States in Quantum Mechanics?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Robert Shaw
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Quantum
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the perception of entangled states in quantum mechanics by different observers, specifically contrasting the views of Earth-based observers (Alice and Bob) with those of Martian observers (Ylc and Zog). The conversation explores the implications of measurement and state preparation in quantum mechanics, questioning whether different observers can perceive the same quantum state as entangled or separable.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that Alice and Bob observe a state as separable, while Ylc and Zog observe the same state as entangled, suggesting a discrepancy in observations based on the observers' locations.
  • One participant emphasizes the need to specify the manner of measurement and preparation in quantum mechanics, arguing that vague terms like "specified manner" do not yield good physics.
  • Another participant challenges the claim that a state can be perceived differently by different observers, stating that entanglement is an invariant property of the state, independent of the observer.
  • There is a request for references or calculations to support the claims about the measurement suboperators used by Alice, Bob, Ylc, and Zog.
  • A later reply questions the clarity of the original claims and suggests using Dirac notation for entangled states to facilitate understanding.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express disagreement regarding whether the same quantum state can be perceived as entangled by one observer and separable by another. The discussion remains unresolved, with multiple competing views presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the limitations of vague definitions in quantum mechanics and the need for precise specifications in measurements and state preparations. The discussion highlights the complexity of interpreting quantum states across different observers.

Robert Shaw
Messages
64
Reaction score
6
Alice and Bob are partial observers of states in a toy quantum Universe and widely discussed in the literature of Quantum Mechanics.

They see some states as separable and others as entangled. For Alice the partial measurement suboperator is diag(1,1,-1,-1) and Bob is diag(1,-1,1,-1).

Martians Ylc and Zog see the world differently. For Ylc adiag(1,1,1,1) and Zog adiag(1,-1,-1,1) ...antidiagonal matrices. Their eigenvectors are the maximally entangled states for Alice and Bob.

A state is prepared which is observed by Alice and Bob to be separable.

Ylc and Zog observe the same state and find it to be entangled.

This inconsistency between earthpersons and martians seems to be allowed in quantum mechanics.

Unless we invoke a rule that earthpersons cannot communicate with martians.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"Quantum theory is a procedure by which scientists predict probabilities that measurements of specified kinds will yield results of specified kinds in situations of specified kinds. It is applied in circumstances that are described by saying that a certain physical system is first prepared in a specified manner and is later examined in a specified manner."

http://www.informationphilosopher.com/solutions/scientists/stapp/Copenhagen_Interpretation.pdf

So, you must first specify how exactly the measurement is performed, on Earth or Mars, and only after that apply any QM.

 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Robert Shaw
AlexCaledin said:
"Quantum theory is a procedure by which scientists predict probabilities that measurements of specified kinds will yield results of specified kinds in situations of specified kinds. It is applied in circumstances that are described by saying that a certain physical system is first prepared in a specified manner and is later examined in a specified manner."

http://www.informationphilosopher.com/solutions/scientists/stapp/Copenhagen_Interpretation.pdf

So, you must first specify how exactly the measurement is performed, on Earth or Mars, and only after that apply any QM.

I think I like your answer, but I have doubts that you haven't addressed.

The term "specified manner" sounds reasonable and reassuring but is actually vague.

"I bought it at Aldi" so it's been prepared in a "specific manner".

"I weighed it on my bathroom scales" so it's been measured in a "specified manner".

Specifying the manner of preparation and measurement does not yield good physics.

We need to do more than "specify the manner"...

...but what more do we need!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: AlexCaledin
Robert Shaw said:
For Alice the partial measurement suboperator is diag(1,1,-1,-1) and Bob is diag(1,-1,1,-1).
For Ylc adiag(1,1,1,1) and Zog adiag(1,-1,-1,1) ...antidiagonal matrices. Their eigenvectors are the maximally entangled states for Alice and Bob.
Where did you get this from? Some reference? Some calculation which you can present here?
 
Robert Shaw said:
A state is prepared which is observed by Alice and Bob to be separable.

Ylc and Zog observe the same state and find it to be entangled.

Please show your work. As far as I know this is impossible; whether or not a state is entangled is an invariant property of the state, independent of who is observing it.
 
Robert Shaw said:
Alice and Bob are partial observers of states in a toy quantum Universe and widely discussed in the literature of Quantum Mechanics.

They see some states as separable and others as entangled. For Alice the partial measurement suboperator is diag(1,1,-1,-1) and Bob is diag(1,-1,1,-1).

Martians Ylc and Zog see the world differently. For Ylc adiag(1,1,1,1) and Zog adiag(1,-1,-1,1) ...antidiagonal matrices. Their eigenvectors are the maximally entangled states for Alice and Bob.

A state is prepared which is observed by Alice and Bob to be separable.

Ylc and Zog observe the same state and find it to be entangled.

This inconsistency between earthpersons and martians seems to be allowed in quantum mechanics.

Unless we invoke a rule that earthpersons cannot communicate with martians.

I don't understand exactly what you're claiming here. Can we use the more traditional Dirac notation for entangled states?

If you have two maximally entangled spin-1/2 particles, then they can be described as being in the composite state:

\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} ( |u_z\rangle |d_z\rangle - |d_z\rangle |u_z\rangle)

So that's a superposition of two states:
  1. |u_z\rangle |d_z\rangle, in which the first particle is spin-up in the z-direction, and the other particle is spin-down
  2. |d_z\rangle |u_z\rangle, in which the first particle is spin-down in the z-direction, and the other particle is spin-up
(Choosing any other direction leads to the same composite state, if the total spin is zero)

So what do you mean by saying that it's entangled for the Earthlings, but not the extraterrestrials, or vice-versa?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
719
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K