I Do Different Observers See Different Entangled States in Quantum Mechanics?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Robert Shaw
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Quantum
Robert Shaw
Messages
64
Reaction score
6
Alice and Bob are partial observers of states in a toy quantum Universe and widely discussed in the literature of Quantum Mechanics.

They see some states as separable and others as entangled. For Alice the partial measurement suboperator is diag(1,1,-1,-1) and Bob is diag(1,-1,1,-1).

Martians Ylc and Zog see the world differently. For Ylc adiag(1,1,1,1) and Zog adiag(1,-1,-1,1) ...antidiagonal matrices. Their eigenvectors are the maximally entangled states for Alice and Bob.

A state is prepared which is observed by Alice and Bob to be separable.

Ylc and Zog observe the same state and find it to be entangled.

This inconsistency between earthpersons and martians seems to be allowed in quantum mechanics.

Unless we invoke a rule that earthpersons cannot communicate with martians.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"Quantum theory is a procedure by which scientists predict probabilities that measurements of specified kinds will yield results of specified kinds in situations of specified kinds. It is applied in circumstances that are described by saying that a certain physical system is first prepared in a specified manner and is later examined in a specified manner."

http://www.informationphilosopher.com/solutions/scientists/stapp/Copenhagen_Interpretation.pdf

So, you must first specify how exactly the measurement is performed, on Earth or Mars, and only after that apply any QM.

 
  • Like
Likes Robert Shaw
AlexCaledin said:
"Quantum theory is a procedure by which scientists predict probabilities that measurements of specified kinds will yield results of specified kinds in situations of specified kinds. It is applied in circumstances that are described by saying that a certain physical system is first prepared in a specified manner and is later examined in a specified manner."

http://www.informationphilosopher.com/solutions/scientists/stapp/Copenhagen_Interpretation.pdf

So, you must first specify how exactly the measurement is performed, on Earth or Mars, and only after that apply any QM.

I think I like your answer, but I have doubts that you haven't addressed.

The term "specified manner" sounds reasonable and reassuring but is actually vague.

"I bought it at Aldi" so it's been prepared in a "specific manner".

"I weighed it on my bathroom scales" so it's been measured in a "specified manner".

Specifying the manner of preparation and measurement does not yield good physics.

We need to do more than "specify the manner"...

...but what more do we need!
 
  • Like
Likes AlexCaledin
Robert Shaw said:
For Alice the partial measurement suboperator is diag(1,1,-1,-1) and Bob is diag(1,-1,1,-1).
For Ylc adiag(1,1,1,1) and Zog adiag(1,-1,-1,1) ...antidiagonal matrices. Their eigenvectors are the maximally entangled states for Alice and Bob.
Where did you get this from? Some reference? Some calculation which you can present here?
 
Robert Shaw said:
A state is prepared which is observed by Alice and Bob to be separable.

Ylc and Zog observe the same state and find it to be entangled.

Please show your work. As far as I know this is impossible; whether or not a state is entangled is an invariant property of the state, independent of who is observing it.
 
Robert Shaw said:
Alice and Bob are partial observers of states in a toy quantum Universe and widely discussed in the literature of Quantum Mechanics.

They see some states as separable and others as entangled. For Alice the partial measurement suboperator is diag(1,1,-1,-1) and Bob is diag(1,-1,1,-1).

Martians Ylc and Zog see the world differently. For Ylc adiag(1,1,1,1) and Zog adiag(1,-1,-1,1) ...antidiagonal matrices. Their eigenvectors are the maximally entangled states for Alice and Bob.

A state is prepared which is observed by Alice and Bob to be separable.

Ylc and Zog observe the same state and find it to be entangled.

This inconsistency between earthpersons and martians seems to be allowed in quantum mechanics.

Unless we invoke a rule that earthpersons cannot communicate with martians.

I don't understand exactly what you're claiming here. Can we use the more traditional Dirac notation for entangled states?

If you have two maximally entangled spin-1/2 particles, then they can be described as being in the composite state:

\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} ( |u_z\rangle |d_z\rangle - |d_z\rangle |u_z\rangle)

So that's a superposition of two states:
  1. |u_z\rangle |d_z\rangle, in which the first particle is spin-up in the z-direction, and the other particle is spin-down
  2. |d_z\rangle |u_z\rangle, in which the first particle is spin-down in the z-direction, and the other particle is spin-up
(Choosing any other direction leads to the same composite state, if the total spin is zero)

So what do you mean by saying that it's entangled for the Earthlings, but not the extraterrestrials, or vice-versa?
 
We often see discussions about what QM and QFT mean, but hardly anything on just how fundamental they are to much of physics. To rectify that, see the following; https://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/66a6a6005101a2ffa86cdd48/original/a-derivation-of-maxwell-s-equations-from-first-principles.pdf 'Somewhat magically, if one then applies local gauge invariance to the Dirac Lagrangian, a field appears, and from this field it is possible to derive Maxwell’s...
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Back
Top