I Do EM waves have negative frequency inside negative-index materials?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter jeast
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Em waves
jeast
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
The speed of light in a vacuum, ##c##, is defined as positive.

The refractive index of a material, ##n##, can be positive or negative.

The dispersion relation for light inside the material is given by

$$\omega=\frac{c}{n}|\mathbf{k}|.$$
The magnitude of the wavevector, ##|\mathbf{k}|##, must be positive by definition therefore the sign of the wave frequency ##\omega## is determined solely by the refractive index ##n##.

Thus if the refractive index ##n## is negative then the frequency ##\omega## is negative.

Is this reasoning correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jeast said:
The speed of light in a vacuum, ##c##, is defined as positive.

The refractive index of a material, ##n##, can be positive or negative.

The dispersion relation for light inside the material is given by

$$\omega=\frac{c}{n}|\mathbf{k}|.$$
The magnitude of the wavevector, ##|\mathbf{k}|##, must be positive by definition therefore the sign of the wave frequency ##\omega## is determined solely by the refractive index ##n##.

Thus if the refractive index ##n## is negative then the frequency ##\omega## is negative.

Is this reasoning correct?
You very often get negative frequencies even in vacuum, so sure you can have them in materials too. For example, when you take a signal at baseband and then you modulate it, with e.g. a ##\cos## carrier, the result has both positive frequency and negative frequency components.
And with a quadrature transmitter and detector you can even have a purely negative frequency signal.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and turo_loler
Any local relativistic field has always wavemmodes with both positive and negative frequencies. The decomposition of free em. waves in plane-wave modes reads (in radiation gauge)
$$\vec{A}(t,\vec{x})=\sum_{\lambda \in \{1,-1\}} \int_{\mathbb{R}^3} \frac{\mathrm{d}^3 k}{(2 \pi)^3} \left [A_{\lambda}(\vec{k}) \vec{\epsilon}_{\lambda}(\vec{k}) \exp(-\mathrm{i} \omega_k t + \mathrm{i} \vec{k} \cdot \vec{x}) + A^*_{\lambda}(\vec{k}) \vec{\epsilon}_{\lambda}^*(\vec{k}) \exp[+\mathrm{i} \omega_k t -\mathrm{i} \vec{k} \cdot \vec{x} \right].$$
Here ##\vec{\epsilon}_{\lambda}(\vec{k})## are orthogonal to ##\vec{k}## and helicitity eigenstates (referring to left- and right-circular polarization) and ##\omega_k=c |\vec{k}|##.
 
  • Like
Likes DrClaude and Dale
Classically, the distinction between positive and negative frequencies makes no sense as an electromagnetic wave is always a superposition ##a\exp(i(\mathbf{kr}-\omega t))+a^*\exp(-i(\mathbf{kr}-\omega t))##.
 
  • Like
Likes Demystifier and vanhees71
It seems this is a good time to close this thread and put the discussion of negative indices and frequencies to rest.

Thank you all for contributing here.

Jedi
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
I am not sure if this falls under classical physics or quantum physics or somewhere else (so feel free to put it in the right section), but is there any micro state of the universe one can think of which if evolved under the current laws of nature, inevitably results in outcomes such as a table levitating? That example is just a random one I decided to choose but I'm really asking about any event that would seem like a "miracle" to the ordinary person (i.e. any event that doesn't seem to...
Back
Top