Do force drifts occur in highly collisional plasmas

AI Thread Summary
Force drifts in partially ionized plasmas occur differently than in collisionless scenarios, as collisions significantly alter particle behavior. In highly collisional plasmas, the guiding center drifts derived from collisionless models do not apply, leading to a situation where the plasma behaves as if there is no magnetic field. When a DC electric field is present, particles drift parallel to this field rather than following the expected E x B drift. The drift direction varies between collisionless and highly collisional cases, with specific angles depending on the relationship between collision frequency and gyrofrequency. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for accurately modeling plasmas, such as those found in the ionosphere.
chandrahas
Messages
72
Reaction score
2
I've read on wikipedia that the force drifts of the guiding centers off particles in a magnetic field also occurs in cold plasma. But does it occur in a cold plasma (Partially Ionized ) in which the mean free time is less than the gyro frequency time?

I thought that the drift were present because of the asymmetry in the gyration. In order to observe this effect, the orbit has to be completed. At least partially. But if the mean free time is smaller than the time required to complete an orbit we wouldn't be observing this effect would we?

To sum it all up: Do force drift occur in Partially Ionized plasmas in which the mean free time is much smaller than the time of gyration?

Thanks
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
As you guessed, the guiding center drifts derived in the collisionless case do not apply if there are collisions. In order to properly include collisions, we usually look for stationary solutions of a multi-fluid model with explicit collision terms.

This approach is used to model the ionosphere, which is highly collisional at low altitudes and weakly collisional at high altitudes.

It turns out that the highly collisional plasma essentially behaves as if there is no magnetic field. For example, consider a plasma with a DC electric field perpendicular to a DC magnetic field. In the highly collisional case the particles drift parallel to the electric field. In the collisionless case you get the standard ##\mathbf{E \times B}## drift. In the intermediate case the drift is in some direction betwen those two extremes; when the collision frequency equals the gyrofrequency the drift is exactly 45 degrees from both ##\mathbf{E}## and ##\mathbf{E \times B}##.

Jason
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top