Do free electrons protons neutrons assemble into atoms?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the assembly of protons, neutrons, and electrons into atoms, questioning the underlying theories of elementary particles. It highlights that while protons and electrons can pair easily, nucleons require immense pressure, such as that found in stars, to combine effectively. Free neutrons have a short half-life of about 14 minutes, necessitating high concentrations of particles for stable formation into elements. The role of nucleosynthesis, particularly during the Big Bang and in stellar environments, is emphasized as crucial for understanding atomic formation. Overall, the assembly of these particles into atoms is complex and influenced by specific conditions in the universe.
a dull boy
Messages
39
Reaction score
1
Dear Physics Forum,

I wanted to know if there is any theory of elementary particles that explains why protons, neutrons, and electrons assemble into atoms? When these particles were first made in the Universe, why do the assemble into atoms? For example, why don't electrons simply bind protons in a 1:1 manner, and let the free neutrons decay? In a experimental preparation of electrons, neutrons, and protons, do they spontaneously assemble into atoms?

Atoms strike me as a somewhat arbitrary and overly complicated preparation of these components...Is there theory on this?

Thanks very much,
Mark
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I believe protons and electrons will pair up quite easily if left alone together - after a few drinks, that is.

Nucleons (particles from the nucleus) won't without immense pressure, like inside of stars as alemsalem mentioned.
 
Thanks very much - the article on nucleosynthesis and the pressure dependence of nucleosynthesis were very helpful (after a few drinks!)
Mark
 
Neutrons don't exist for very long on their own. Free neutrons have a half life of about 14 minutes. That implies they need to be in a relatively high concentration with protons etc before they are likely to combine into elements before they split back into protons and electrons.
You need 'stellar mass' for the process to work to any significant degree, I think.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top