Do Gravity Waves Contribute to Gravitational Curvature?

  • Thread starter Thread starter zankaon
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity
zankaon
Messages
163
Reaction score
0
Does gravity gravitate? Would the following link be of any relevance? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stress-energy_tensor"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Space news on Phys.org
Hi zankaon,

Gravity most definitely is believed to gravitate. All forms of mass and energy (with the possible exception of the kinetic energy of movement) are believed to gravitate, regardless of whether they have a zero rest mass. This includes gravity itself, photons, and the strong and weak nuclear forces.

When a very large star (say, more than 20 solar masses) runs low on fuel to sustain its fusion, its internal pressure drops and it begins to collapse on itself. This causes density to increase, which increases the internal gravitational field, and so on; the process becomes self-reinforcing until the star collapses to a black hole singularity. "Remarkably, as one approaches the singularity, it is this gravitation of gravity, rather than the gravitation of matter, that is the most important effect - or, as it is sometimes said, near a singularity matter doesn't matter."

The quotation is from the Einstein Online article on http://http://www.einstein-online.info/en/spotlights/singularities_bkl/index.html" These articles also explain the nonintuitive concept of "mass defect".

Jon
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Do gravity waves gravitate?

Do gravity waves gravitate? Yes. In the vicinity of compact object binary, such as for binary double neutron stars, or a double Black Holes, both in tight orbits, gravity waves would be generated. Even though the energy of g.w.s can't be localized, still an average energy can be derived. Such energy would contribute to stress-energy- momentum tensor on the right, and hence to curvature on the left in Einstein eq. http://http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_radiation"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...
Back
Top