Do heavy and light cylinders roll the same?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Gary_1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cylinders Light Roll
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

In the discussion, participants explore the dynamics of cylinders rolling down an inclined plane without slippage. It is established that both heavy and light cylinders will reach the bottom simultaneously if they are of the same shape and material, as their acceleration is independent of mass. However, variations in radius and moment of inertia, particularly between homogeneous and non-homogeneous cylinders, can affect the rolling motion. The center of mass plays a crucial role, especially on curved slopes, influencing the path length and time taken to reach the bottom.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion
  • Familiarity with the concept of moment of inertia
  • Knowledge of rolling motion dynamics
  • Basic principles of inclined planes in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the effects of moment of inertia on rolling objects
  • Learn about the physics of inclined planes and their impact on motion
  • Investigate the differences between homogeneous and non-homogeneous materials
  • Explore the dynamics of rolling motion on curved surfaces
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding the principles of rolling motion and dynamics of objects on inclined planes.

Gary_1
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I understand why a heavy item and a light item both fall a given distance in the same time - in a vacuum, etc.

What happens in the case of a cylinder rolling down an inclined plane with no slippage? Would a heavy cylinder reach the bottom at the same time as would a light cylinder? What if the cylinders were of differing radii? What if the cylinders had a differing moment of inertia, e.g., one cylinder with homogeneous density versus another that was of higher density nearer the surface of the cylinder?

Thansk for helping me understand.
 
Science news on Phys.org
Thinking about it more, I'm actually not entirely sure if that statement generalizes to arbitrarily *curved* slopes. For cylindrical objects my calculation is correct. The catch is that the height refers to the center of mass and the center of mass might trace out shorter or longer paths (depending on the radius of the cylinder) if the slope isn't flat but curved. Hmm...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
928
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
6K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
15K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K