Do I always have to convert to SI units?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the necessity of converting units to SI when calculating the minimum mass of a star using the formula M=PV³/2πG. Participants emphasize the importance of maintaining consistency in units, particularly when using values such as V=400 km/s and P=34.4 hours. While some argue for sticking to the original units provided, the consensus leans towards converting to SI units for clarity and accuracy, especially if gravitational constant G is in SI. Ultimately, the recommendation is to use SI units to avoid discrepancies in calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the formula M=PV³/2πG
  • Familiarity with SI units and their conversions
  • Knowledge of the gravitational constant G
  • Basic principles of astrophysics related to stellar mass calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Research unit conversion techniques for astrophysical calculations
  • Study the implications of using different unit systems in scientific formulas
  • Learn about the gravitational constant G and its applications in astrophysics
  • Explore numerical methods for solving equations with varying units
USEFUL FOR

Astrophysicists, physics students, educators, and anyone involved in calculations related to stellar mass and unit conversions in scientific contexts.

Bugsy23
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
Hi, I'm trying to calculate the minimum mass of a star, where
M=PV³/2πG

The values I've been given are V=400km s^-1 and P=34.4 hours.

Does this mean that I have to convert these values to SI units, i.e. give the values in terms of metres and seconds rather than km and hours? This would obviously give a very different answer so I'm not sure
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Bugsy23 said:
Hi, I'm trying to calculate the minimum mass of a star, where
M=PV³/2πG

The values I've been given are V=400km s^-1 and P=34.4 hours.

Does this mean that I have to convert these values to SI units, i.e. give the values in terms of metres and seconds rather than km and hours? This would obviously give a very different answer so I'm not sure
I would say that if you are given units in km and hrs, it makes sense to keep things in those units, not switch to meters and seconds.
 
Mark44 said:
I would say that if you are given units in km and hrs, it makes sense to keep things in those units, not switch to meters and seconds.

Assuming that any constants are also in those units -in this case you also have G
 
If you solve both numerically and with the units, you may also get factors of 3600 s h-1 floating around, so I'd suggest ensuring compatibility there.
 
In other words, just be consistent in your use of units- if part of your problem has measurements in "miles" and "hours" and another in "meters" and "seconds", convert to one or the other.

Does it matter which you use? Yes, if your teacher says so!
 
Bugsy23 said:
Hi, I'm trying to calculate the minimum mass of a star, where
M=PV³/2πG

The values I've been given are V=400km s^-1 and P=34.4 hours.

Does this mean that I have to convert these values to SI units, i.e. give the values in terms of metres and seconds rather than km and hours? This would obviously give a very different answer so I'm not sure

I think as a general rule it's always safest and quickest to stick to SI.
 
Bugsy23 said:
...M=PV³/2πG...

...Does this mean that I have to convert these values to SI units,...
It really depends what units you are using for G. The other quantities' units should be consistent with that.

Dadface said:
I think as a general rule it's always safest and quickest to stick to SI.
Agreed, when in doubt go with SI units for everything.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 95 ·
4
Replies
95
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K