Do Japanese authorities need to cool before dismantle

  • Thread starter Thread starter cloa513
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cool
AI Thread Summary
Japanese authorities are considering the use of mobile cranes and advanced technology to safely remove and contain fuel rods from nuclear facilities, emphasizing the need for secure containment before dismantling. The current cooling systems must function effectively to allow heat and radioactivity to decay, enabling safer storage of spent fuel. Decontamination of water used in cooling is also a critical concern, requiring filtration and secure packaging of radionuclides for disposal. Accessing the plant's top for these operations should not significantly disrupt other activities, as high-temperature steels can withstand brief exposure to intense heat. A comprehensive plan from AREVA aims to address the decontamination of radioactive water at the Fukushima site.
cloa513
Messages
36
Reaction score
4
I am thinking why not use mobile cranes to slowly prepare to remove fuel rods (vision from UAV or distant helicopters or balloons) (cutting using fibre lasers) and then remove and contain fuel rods. They already have a concrete truck reaching 44 metres to deliver water and the world longest reach crane is 100 m so the lengths to reach are within current technology. Most of crane's actions are mechanical so radiation is not a big issue and operator would be out of line of sight.

Is it just linear thinking on the nuclear authorities/industry or is absolutely necessary to get cooling to work permanently before considering dismantling?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Yes - for assemblies or collection of fuel rods. They are waiting to place the assemblies and collection of rods in more secure containment. The heat generation and radioactivity must be allowed to decay in order for current systems to be used for storage.

The other concern is decontamination of the water used to cool the spent fuel and fuel in the reactor. The radionuclides will have to be filtered and collected, and packaged securely for final disposal.
 
Thank you for your reply. No reason that accessing the top of the plant should in any way (except sometimes less direct water flows for short periods) affect their other activities whether it be water management or cooling systems. The fuel rods may be very hot but for high temperature steels e.g. 1000 C is no big deal for short periods (specialty steels) and steel may be affected by the radiation but hardly likely over short periods. The fuel rods only need to put and contained in short term steel vessels long enough for more permanent vessels to made available.
 
Actually AREVA has a plan to process the radioactive water.

From AREVA's website - AREVA to set up a water decontamination process for the Fukushima site
http://www.areva.com/EN/news-8856/a...amination-process-for-the-fukushima-site.html

They need to decontaminate the cores and SFP to the extent possible, then the remove whatever fuel is intact, then remove the debris, then disassemble the primary systems, then disassemble the containment and secondary sides.
 
Hello everyone, I am currently working on a burnup calculation for a fuel assembly with repeated geometric structures using MCNP6. I have defined two materials (Material 1 and Material 2) which are actually the same material but located in different positions. However, after running the calculation with the BURN card, I am encountering an issue where all burnup information(power fraction(Initial input is 1,but output file is 0), burnup, mass, etc.) for Material 2 is zero, while Material 1...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
4K
Back
Top