Do moon phases affect weighing precision on the microgram range?

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
6 replies · 2K views
lionpauu
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
Do Moon phases affect weighing precision on the microgram range, over several hours days at elevated temperatures?
Hi,

I'm looking to improve the precision of a system over a several hour cycle of operation of +50°C operation.
The mass is ~11g and is suspended below the balance via a factory provided point. The "sample" is enclosed within a large borosilicate flask 150mm dia x 450 mm height that is trace heated the floor is also heated and all report a 0.1°C deviation from the setpoint of 50°C. The sample itself is monitored via a non-contact IR sensor and reports a 0.1g °C max variation.

So the problem is that the sample will apparently lose up to ~0.015 g after achieving the temperature set point, and this drift will continue for several hours. I have reduced this rate by better sealing the falsk to air ingress and also I think some of the system was accumulating a static charge.

So my question is has anyone an explication of why the loss and recovery inverse to temperature, the loss in air density should increase the apparent wt, could the lunar cycle be having an impact? My balance can resolve 0.0001g and I am logging the data remotely.

There is more on my problem on twitter...

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Tidal accelerations are of the order of ## \frac{m_M GR_{E}}{d^3} = 5\cdot10^{-7} \frac{m}{s^2}##, for an 11 gram object that's ~5 nanonewton or the weight of ~0.5 microgram. Whatever you see, it's not coming from the Moon.

A static charge could produce a force like that.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davyzhu and lionpauu
Welcome to PF.

Convection currents, driven by the temperature of the sample, could cause problems by dragging the sample upwards.

If you think the effect is tidal, then set up a reference weight and record the reading over the next 24 hours. Does the data show two cycles of tide per day ?
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters and lionpauu
Vanadium 50 said:
Even if it's coming from the moon, it's not coming from the phase of the moon, which is a statement about from which direction the moon is lit.
True, but the tidal range is significantly greater during the new or full moon. Then the Sun, Earth and Moon lie on a straight line.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hutchphd and lionpauu
Some thoughts:
Does your instrumentation drift? Check for zero shift with zero weight, both with and without heat.
Is there a chemical reaction that releases a small amount of material as a gas? Repeat test with a metal sample.
Is something evaporating? Ditto.
Is the effect temperature dependent? Check by testing at, for example, 30 and 40 deg C.
Are convective air currents pulling the warm object up?
What happens if you hold at 50 deg C for several hours, then shut the heater off while continuing logging until it cools to room temperature?
What happens if you hold at temperature for 24 (or more) hours?

You cannot assume that instrumentation is measuring what you think it is measuring. You need to check everything before running an actual test. I used to call it "testing the test".
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mfb, Bystander and berkeman