Do Multiple Reaction Forces Create Infinite Chains in Newton's Third Law?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on clarifying misconceptions about Newton's Third Law of Motion. It explains that when Body A pushes Body B, the reaction force from B to A is equal and opposite, and there are no additional reaction forces created in a chain. In a scenario with three bodies on a frictionless surface, while A pushes B, it is not necessarily true that B pushes C with the same force as A pushes B. The forces between the bodies are not action-reaction pairs unless they directly interact. Understanding these concepts requires integrating both Newton's Second and Third Laws to analyze the forces accurately.
AmrD
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I have a 2 questions regarding Newton’s third law and I will explain them using examples:

1. Body A is pushing against Body B with a force F(AB), Now body B will push against body A with a reaction force F(BA) equal but opposite to F(AB). Now shouldn’t be another reaction force F2(AB) due to the action of the reaction force F(BA) and another reaction force F2(BA) as a reaction to that reaction !

2. Three bodies A, B and C setting on a frictionless surface in the order A, B and C. A is pushing on B with F(AB)
First, is it true that B will also push on C with the same force F(AB) and if that is true shouldn’t C also exert a reaction force on B with the magnitude F(AB).

I think I am misunderstanding the concept and how are forces transmitted through the bodies and how does Newton’s third law apply here.

I need some help here.

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
AmrD said:
I1. Body A is pushing against Body B with a force F(AB), Now body B will push against body A with a reaction force F(BA) equal but opposite to F(AB). Now shouldn’t be another reaction force F2(AB) due to the action of the reaction force F(BA) and another reaction force F2(BA) as a reaction to that reaction !
There are just two bodies and thus two forces involved: F(AB) and F(BA). Those forces are equal and opposite. (Using your notation, F2(BA) is the same force F(BA).)

2. Three bodies A, B and C setting on a frictionless surface in the order A, B and C. A is pushing on B with F(AB)
First, is it true that B will also push on C with the same force F(AB) and if that is true shouldn’t C also exert a reaction force on B with the magnitude F(AB).
No, it is not true. At least it's not necessarily true. If those blocks are held in place so they have no acceleration, then the force that A exerts on B must equal the force that C exerts on B. Nonetheless, they are not 'action-reaction' pairs.

I think I am misunderstanding the concept and how are forces transmitted through the bodies and how does Newton’s third law apply here.
Using your three bodies (let's assume blocks on a frictionless surface) as an example. The Newton 3rd law pairs are:
(1) A pushes on B and B pushes on A
(2) B pushes on C and C pushes on B

The force between A and B does not necessarily equal the force between B and C. To fully analyze the forces exerted, you'll need Newton's 2nd law as well as the 3rd.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top