Do Newton's Laws Explain Motion and Inertia Anomalies?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Wajdi Al-ashi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Laws Newton's laws
AI Thread Summary
Newton's laws provide a framework for understanding motion and inertia, but questions arise regarding the behavior of objects under different forces. Objects can be considered at rest or in uniform motion based on the reference frame, aligning with Galileo's principle of relativity. When a large force is applied suddenly to an object with significant inertia, the change in momentum depends on the impulse, which is the product of force and time. A small force applied over a longer duration can result in greater impulse, allowing the object to move. Understanding these principles clarifies the nuances of motion and inertia anomalies.
Wajdi Al-ashi
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Q1: Are objects at rest or are they in a uniform motion along a straight line in the world and in the universe?
Q2: Why does an object with an important inertia not move if I apply to it suddenly a big force (accelerate it rapidly)? And on the other hand, the same object does move with a small force applied to it (small acceleration)?

Video done by Julius Sumner Miller to visualise Q1 and Q2:


I know that forces and Newton's laws seems easy to understand, and I actually understand the basics and I memorize what every law does say, but, suddenly many questions (like the above ones) pop up into my mind and I find myself blocked there, because I have a natural tendency to understand everything from the beginning and not to go on to the next level unless I'm feeling that I've mastered the current one.

Wajdi
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Wajdi Al-ashi said:
Why does an object with an important inertia not move if I apply to it suddenly a big force (accelerate it rapidly)?
Watch the video again, and observe what happens when the "sudden big force" is applied. Something does happen. Identify that "something," and you will understand.
 
Wajdi Al-ashi said:
Q1: Are objects at rest or are they in a uniform motion along a straight line in the world and in the universe?
Q2: Why does an object with an important inertia not move if I apply to it suddenly a big force (accelerate it rapidly)? And on the other hand, the same object does move with a small force applied to it (small acceleration)?
For Q1 it doesn't matter. You can perform the analysis in a reference frame where a given object is at rest or in a reference frame where that object is moving in a straight line at constant velocity. Either way you will get the same answer for any measurable outcome, even though the intermediate quantities may differ. This is Galileo's principle of relativity.

For Q2, the change in momentum is related to a quantity called impulse, which is force times time. A small force applied for a long time can easily have a greater impulse than a large force applied for a very short time.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...

Similar threads

Replies
37
Views
483
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top