Do Red Lasers of 314mW Pose a Safety Risk?

  • Thread starter Thread starter davidco2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lasers Safety
AI Thread Summary
Using a 314mW red laser with cylindrical optics to project a line can produce similar brightness to a 1mW laser dot due to comparable intensity levels. While a 1mW laser can potentially cause eye damage, the risk is lower when projected on non-reflective surfaces, though care is advised to avoid reflections from nearby objects. The discussion highlights that even with lower power, caution is necessary as the beam can focus to a smaller spot, increasing hazards. For applications like 3D scanning, it’s important to consider the maximum power that won't alter surfaces or cause skin burns. Overall, safety precautions, including protective eyewear and proper handling, are essential when working with high-powered lasers.
davidco2
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
If using 314mW red laser and cylindrical optics to project a line 500mm x 2mm,
will it have brightness as 1mW laser that projects a dot with r=1mm since the area difference?
1000mm / (1mm^2*3.14)
Would the projected line of that brightness be dangerous if bounced off the reflective surface and hit the eye since it would be less than 1mW hitting the eye? Would it be dangeous to watch it projected on nonreflective surface, without safety googles?
 
Science news on Phys.org
davidco2 said:
If using 314mW red laser and cylindrical optics to project a line 500mm x 2mm,
will it have brightness as 1mW laser that projects a dot with r=1mm since the area difference?
Pretty much, yes.

For the first one, we have
(314 mW / 500x2 mm^2) = 314/1000 mW/mm^2 = 0.314 mW/mm^2

For the second case, it's
(1 mW / π x 1 mm^2) = 1/3.14... mW/mm^2 = 0.318 mW/mm^2

Since we wouldn't know the laser's power to 3 digits of accuracy, these can be considered to be equal.

Would the projected line of that brightness be dangerous if bounced off the reflective surface and hit the eye since it would be less than 1mW hitting the eye?
1 mW can potentially cause eye damage, but if I recall correctly one would normally blink or turn away in time before too much damage occurs at this power level.
Disclaimer: do not intentionally test this idea!

Would it be dangeous to watch it projected on nonreflective surface, without safety googles?
No, that would be safe.
 
davidco2 said:
Would it be dangeous to watch it projected on nonreflective surface, without safety googles?
350mW is dangerous - especially if this is a cheap import unstabilized laser pointer of unknown real power
Even from an unreflective surface there is a danger of a reflection from a watch strap or a screw head while you are adjusting something
If you are going to view this be careful, make sure everything is at waist height and that the laser itself and anything before the cylinder lens is in some sort of enclosure - even a cardboard box will help.
 
mgb_phys said:
350mW is dangerous

Good point. I was thinking in terms of the beam expanded to a 1000 mm^2 area, but there's always the danger that the beam gets focused down to a smaller spot, which would be hazardous.
 
Thanks for the explanation and security warnings!
I have another related question:

This would be used in 3D scanner and on museum objects, to your experience what is the maximum mW rating of projected dot r=2mm that would not cause alternation of the surface/generate heat that could cause that? Also which power would not burn unprotected skin? When a laser protective glasses have that wavelength included in protection range, what is considered as max mW output it protects from?
 
davidco2 said:
If using 314mW red laser and cylindrical optics to project a line 500mm x 2mm,
will it have brightness as 1mW laser that projects a dot with r=1mm since the area difference?
1000mm / (1mm^2*3.14)
Would the projected line of that brightness be dangerous if bounced off the reflective surface and hit the eye since it would be less than 1mW hitting the eye? Would it be dangeous to watch it projected on nonreflective surface, without safety googles?

ITYM having the same *Intensity* (W/area). The brightness also has a component from the beam divergence, and thus may still be different for different lasers (brightness is a conserved quantity).

Since your eye has a non-zero field of view, in order to make a plausible comparison, you must calculate the total optical power incident onto the pupil- the first laser, hitting a concave surface, may throw more power onto an eye than the second.

Based on your questions, I would not recommend working around a ~350mW laser of any type without first taking a safety class.
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top