Do Stars Have Van Allen Radiation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter shounakbhatta
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Radiation
AI Thread Summary
Stars do not possess Van Allen radiation belts like Earth, as they lack a magnetic field capable of trapping charged particles in the same manner. The solar wind from the sun contributes to the presence of charged particles in Earth's magnetic field, but this does not imply that stars have similar structures. While stars may have magnetic fields, they differ significantly from Earth's magnetic field. The discussion highlights the dynamic nature of the sun and its emissions, but concludes that the concept of Van Allen belts is not applicable to stars. Overall, the existence of magnetic fields around stars does not equate to the presence of Van Allen radiation.
shounakbhatta
Messages
287
Reaction score
1
Hello,

I have a question: Do stars have Van Allen Radiation?

Thanks
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
The solar wind emitted by the sun is thought to be the source of the charged particles which become trapped in Earth's magnetic field.

Due to the dynamic nature of the sun, there are all sorts of particles and ionized matter being thrown off the surface of the sun.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Van_Allen_radiation_belt
 
If you could show that a star has a magnetic field surrounding it like the earth’s, then you could say that it would trap particles the same way the Van Allen belt does. As far as I know, stars do not have such a magnetic field.
 
Bobbywhy said:
If you could show that a star has a magnetic field surrounding it like the earth’s.

http://www.stewwebb.com/2013/08/06/the-suns-magnetic-field-is-about-to-flip/

Actually it flipped already about two weeks ago.

I don't mean to say that is has a Van Allen belt.
But stars may have magnetic fields. Of course, they may not be "like the eart's" in some respects.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top