Do theoretical physicists also work in labs?

AI Thread Summary
Powerful computers and experimental results are crucial in validating scientific theories, as experimental verification ultimately determines a theory's validity. However, practical limitations often hinder experiments, such as excessive energy requirements or lengthy computation times that exceed the universe's age. To navigate these challenges, approximations are employed, providing insights into the correctness of theories. The development of contradictory theories poses significant risks, making it essential for theories to align. Consequently, computer simulations and lab approximations play a vital role in theoretical physics. While theorists collaborate with experimentalists and utilize computational tools, most do not engage in physical lab work.
potato123
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
I heard they sometimes need to use powerful computers or see the experiment and results.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yupp.

Theory is instantly put into trash when experiments disprove it. Experimental verification has the final say in deciding the fate of a theory. The problem is experiments aren't always possible. The energy requirements could be too high or time taken for computation could be greater than the age of the universe. It could be anything. Hence approximations are sought after. This at least gives an idea that we could be on a right track when making theories. Developing two theories and realising at the end that they're fundamentally contradictory.. Now that's a nightmare. We don't want that to happen. We want our theories to agree with each other. So computer stimulations and approximation in the lab itself is a key part for success for any theoretical physicist. Super computers are needed too for high end computations.
 
Theorists definitely work with experimentalists and use computational tools. However, the vast majority do not physically work in lab at all.
 
I'm going to make this one quick since I have little time. Background: Throughout my life I have always done good in Math. I almost always received 90%+, and received easily upwards of 95% when I took normal-level HS Math courses. When I took Grade 9 "De-Streamed" Math (All students must take "De-Streamed" in Canada), I initially had 98% until I got very sick and my mark had dropped to 95%. The Physics teachers and Math teachers talked about me as if I were some sort of genius. Then, an...
Bit Britain-specific but I was wondering, what's the best path to take for A-Levels out of the following (I know Y10 seems a bit early to be thinking about A-levels, but my choice will impact what I do this year/ in y11) I (almost) definitely want to do physics at University - so keep that in mind... The subjects that I'm almost definitely going to take are Maths, Further Maths and Physics, and I'm taking a fast track programme which means that I'll be taking AS computer science at the end...
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
Back
Top