Do We Include Signs in Conservation of Momentum Equations?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the treatment of signs in conservation of momentum equations, particularly in the context of collisions. Participants explore whether to include signs with velocities or if they are inherently understood in the momentum calculations, focusing on both theoretical and practical implications.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants argue that momenta are vector quantities, implying that direction is significant and should be explicitly included in calculations.
  • One participant states that conservation of momentum equations should always use a plus sign when adding momenta, but acknowledges that the resulting momentum values can be positive or negative based on the direction of the velocities.
  • Another participant suggests that it is acceptable to keep momentum as a vector quantity throughout the calculations, avoiding the need for negative signs until the final expression.
  • There is a suggestion to explore different scenarios of collisions with varying mass relationships to understand the implications of sign usage better.
  • A humorous exchange occurs regarding the certainty of the statements made, indicating a light-hearted debate on the topic.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on whether to include signs in momentum equations. Multiple competing views remain regarding the treatment of directionality and the representation of velocities in calculations.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions about the direction of velocities and the specific context of the collision scenarios are not fully detailed, which may affect the interpretation of the discussion.

Mr Davis 97
Messages
1,461
Reaction score
44
When we use the conservation of momentum with, for example, collisions do we include the sign with the velocities or are the signs inherent in the quantity? For examples, would we write ##m_1v_1 = m_1v_1 + m_2v_2## or ##m_1v_1 = -m_1v_1 + m_2v_2## for a collision where a moving object hits a stationary one and then moves backwards while the stationary object moves forward.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Momenta are vector quantities, so direction matters. In your problem, assume the event lies in the x coordinate. What are the initial and final momentum vectors of the object?
 
You always add the momenta; conservation of momentum for a two-body straight-line collision says that ##m_1v_1+m_2v_2=m_1v_1'+m_2v_2'## and it's always a plus sign. (##m_1## is the mass of the first object and ##v_1## and ##v_1'## are its velocities before and after the collision; similarly for the second object with mass ##m_2##).

However, the momentum itself will be a positive or negative number depending on whether the velocity is positive or negative. For example, if we collide a moving object of mass ##m_1=3## kg with a stationary object of mass ##m_2=6## kg, we start with ##v_1## positive and ##v_2## equal to zero. After the collision ##v_1'## is negative and ##v_2'## is positive.

It would be a good exercise to try three different examples: one in which ##m_1## is less than ##{m}_2## (as above), one in which they are equal, and one in which ##m_1## is greater.
 
Since momentum is a vector quantity, if you write the momentum balances with the unit vectors included, you can never go wrong.
 
I think he means if for example the magnitude of ##V_1## is ##V_1## and the direction is for example set to negative. He is asking whether he should substitute the magnitude with a negative sign.

You could keep it as a vector quantity until the end of your equation and then substitute the negative sign with the magnitude of the velocity or substitute it from the beginning it is up to you. Think of it as If it is a vector you don't need negative and positive. If you change it to magnitudes then you have to express opposite vectors by giving one of the vectors a negative signs
 
Chestermiller said:
you can never go wrong.
Wanna bet? :wink:
 
sophiecentaur said:
Wanna bet? :wink:
Ha! Good one.

Chet
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
956
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
4K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K