Do we know that time actually exists?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jupiter60
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Time
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the existence of time, with some arguing it is merely a conceptual tool like mathematics, while others assert it is a measurable physical quantity. Critics claim that clocks do not prove time's existence, suggesting that if a clock stops, time does not cease. Proponents counter that clocks measure time, thus affirming its reality. The debate highlights the distinction between theoretical constructs and observable phenomena in science. Ultimately, the conversation emphasizes the importance of time in scientific modeling and observation.
Jupiter60
Messages
79
Reaction score
22
Does it really exist? I personally think that it doesn't, it's just another thing like math which doesn't exist in reality. Is there evidence that time is an actual real thing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Terms like "actually exist", "reality" and "actual real thing" are not generally meaningful with respect to science. Science is about observations and modeling those observations with theories. Time is vitally necessary for us to model our observations with the predictive and descriptive power that our theories have. In this context its just as "real" as any other vital component of theory.
 
Yes, we do. It has been measured since antiquity with watches and clocks.
 
dauto said:
Yes, we do. It has been measured since antiquity with watches and clocks.

Does "time" stop when the watches and clocks hands aren't moving? I don't think so. If I took the battery out of my wall clock, would "time" stop? No, but the clock would. Clocks do not prove the existence of time.
 
Jupiter60 said:
Does "time" stop when the watches and clocks hands aren't moving? I don't think so.

Correct
 
Jupiter60 said:
Does "time" stop when the watches and clocks hands aren't moving? I don't think so. If I took the battery out of my wall clock, would "time" stop? No, but the clock would. Clocks do not prove the existence of time.

If I break a ruler would space disappear? If I break a balance does mass stop existing? etc...

You don't really have a point.

I define time as the physical quantity measured by clocks. Since clocks do measure something, time exists.
 
Jupiter60 said:
Clocks do not prove the existence of time.
Sure they do. They measure something, that something is time, by definition.
 
Back
Top