- #1
- 13
- 0
So many people say that women have stronger legs. Some people say no. What does the biological evidence say? I thought men legs are stronger than women. What do you think? Please be honest.
Last edited:
So, I don't have to be serious as long as I'm honest?
So, I don't have to be serious as long as I'm honest?
umm this guy has squatted 1200 lbs. which is the world record.
http://www.powerliftingwatch.com/video/Mike-Miller-1220Squat.WMV
See here:
http://jap.physiology.org/cgi/content/abstract/71/2/644
Women have less "absolute" strength within muscles, but the difference is not present when strength is normalized for muscle mass. Thus, find a women with larger leg muscle mass than you, and you find one stronger than you.
See also:
http://jap.physiology.org/cgi/content/abstract/83/5/1581
The average male has a larger amount of testosterone in his body that females, which is a big factor to consider here.
Oh man. Read the thread carefully. I said *lower body* (legs). Not upper body. How many times do I have to say that? Because some people say that women legs are strong than men's which is wrong.
By strength, I assume that you mean absolute strength. Are you comparing a man and a woman that both have the same weight? Or are you comparing an average sized man and an average sized woman? Is there an age range for your test subjects? How much strength training exercises is in the test subjects' history? etc...I mean leg muscles (calves, thighs). What has squat to do with legs? Anyway squat also requires other than your leg like your back.
That is completely irrelevant. Testosterone has an effect on the entire body, even on the lower body.
I mean leg muscles (calves, thighs). What has squat to do with legs? Anyway squat also requires other than your leg like your back.
I agree.It seems that you are not satisfied with a reply unless they state somehow that women's legs are stronger than a man's.