Do you have to refer core losses in equivalent circuit?

  1. Hi, I'm currently writing a lab report on single phase transformers and I need to determine the equivalent circuit with respect to the secondary side. I have already found the parameters with respect to the primary side so it is just a matter of referring them to the secondary side. What I would like to know is whether the core losses (Ro and (Xm) have to be referred as well and why.

    I think they should be referred because they are a function of the current which would change depending on if it's in the primary or secondary side.....right? :confused:
    However, I'm not 100% sure so can someone tell me if I'm right or wrong in thinking this way please?

    Thanks in advance :smile:
    Last edited: Mar 31, 2014
  2. jcsd
  3. core losses xm and ro can be modeled as a resistor and an inductor both in parallel with the primary coil.

    In a lab report it would be very good to refer to them as it would demonstrate understanding of the system as well as an understand of non ideal effects.
Know someone interested in this topic? Share a link to this question via email, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?

Draft saved Draft deleted