Do you integrate a variable charge density when solving for Q?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on integrating a variable charge density when calculating the total charge in a specified volume. The charge density is given as p = p0*(a^2 - z^2), and the confusion arises regarding whether to substitute this expression before or after integrating. It is clarified that the variable charge density p depends on z, meaning it cannot be factored out of the integral. The total charge is computed by integrating p(z) over the limits from -b to b, as it accounts for all values of z within that range. Understanding the relationship between charge density and the integration limits is crucial for accurate calculations.
Axxaaa
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
For example, let's say there was an block infinitely long in the x and y direction and in the z direction bounded by positive and negative a.

I am trying to find the charge of a imaginary partition infinitely long in the x and y direction and in the z direction bounded by positive and negative b, where b is less than a.

Here is where I get confused, if the charge density is something like p = p0*(a^2 - z^2), where z in the case is b, as mentioned above.

dQ = p * dV

Do i integrate from here or do I substitute in p = p0*(a^2 - z^2), and then integrate?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As p is equal to p0*(a^2 - z^2) it does not matter, but I wonder how you try to integrate it without replacing p by the other expression.
 
I thought to just take p out of the integral and substitute it in later after I integrate dV with respect to z. Also, p should still matter because I stated that z^2 is in this case b^2.
 
Perhaps this will help: ##\renewcommand{\d}{\text{d}}##
The charge in the infinite sheet between ##z## and ##z+dz## is $$\d q=p(z)\d z$$
So the charge within ##|z|<b## is the sum of all such sheets inside that range.

I stated that z^2 is in this case b^2.
In your example, "##z^2=b^2##", as you say, only at the point ##z=b## ... but the total charge includes all the charge at all points between z=-b and z=b as well - so z has to be able to take on all values in between. vis: $$q=\int_{-b}^b p(z)\;\d z$$ ... i.e. you cannot take ##p## outside the integral because it depends on the variable being integrated over.

There may be a small confusion here though.
after I integrate dV with respect to z
$$\d q=\rho(x,y,z) \d V = p(z)\d z : p(z)=\int_{-\infty}^\infty\int_{-\infty}^\infty\rho(x,y,z)\; \d x\d y$$ ... the provided density function has already done two of the integrations for you - so you are not integrating dV over z.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top