Do You Struggle with Mathematical Clumsiness?

  • Thread starter Thread starter farleyknight
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mathematical
AI Thread Summary
Mathematical clumsiness often stems from careless mistakes, such as miswriting variables or dropping important symbols. To improve accuracy, it's suggested to write larger and avoid combining sub-steps on a single line, ensuring both sides of an equation remain balanced. Instead of erasing errors, crossing them out can preserve correct calculations. Practicing clear variable writing and spacing terms further apart can also help prevent confusion. Consistent practice and attention to detail are key to overcoming these challenges.
farleyknight
Messages
143
Reaction score
0
Hey all,

I'm need some advice. I'm finding myself making a lot of mistakes. Not because I don't understand certain ideas, but because write things down incorrectly, like dropping an exponent or a prime-mark, or switching an x for a y. I'm trying to write neater and bigger but I still make dumb mistakes. Does anyone else have this problem?

Thanks,
- Rob
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
YES!

I have to go very slow and be very careful. My problem, I think, is disuse.
During times when I do a lot of math I tend to get better.
Funny how that works.
 
I strugled with a problem like this for a while. I would work problems through to a number, and then write 68 instead of 86! It will get better with time, but there are a few pointers I can give.

WRITE BIG
This was mostly to accomadate for my sloppy writing, but It could help anyone.

Don't do sub steps within one line. You may already beyond this advice, but make sure both sides of an equation are still exactly balanced as you go down a page.

Don't erase. You can erase one or two errors, but if a line has several errors or took you in the wrong direction, cross it out with a single line. You might save some of the math steps you did because they may be correct. Continue below where you crossed out.

As far as mixing up x and y, I've done that too. Typical variables x, y, and t can all look the same with slopy writting. Try to practice the script x as it is printed in math books. Also, give your t the tail to the right so it dosen't look like a + sign.

To keep different terms seperate, I usually write terms further appart on the paper. For example...

y = 2x^2 + 3x - 5

And exageration, but it really helps if you have complicated terms where you need to work through multiplying and dividing my several negative numbers.That's all I can think of for now.
 
Last edited:
If you have a long part of your expression that you keep writing over and over, use dito marks.
 
Thanks guys, I'll give that a shot.
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top