Do you think Relativity theory can explain all the paradoxes?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the paradoxes arising from Einstein's theory of relativity, specifically regarding time dilation and simultaneity as illustrated through a thought experiment involving a proton accelerated to 99.99999999% of the speed of light. Participants highlight the roles of "Relativity of simultaneity," "Born rigidity," and "Minkowski spacetime diagrams" in resolving these paradoxes. The paradox presented involves a scientist on Earth who dies before a proton, which has aged only a year, reaches Earth, creating conflicting timelines. Ultimately, the consensus is that the paradox can be resolved by analyzing the situation from different reference frames, particularly the frame in which the proton is at rest.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Einstein's theory of relativity
  • Familiarity with time dilation and simultaneity concepts
  • Knowledge of Minkowski spacetime diagrams
  • Basic principles of reference frames in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the "Relativity of simultaneity" in detail
  • Explore "Born rigidity" and its implications in relativistic physics
  • Learn how to construct and interpret "Minkowski spacetime diagrams"
  • Investigate time dilation effects at relativistic speeds using practical examples
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of relativity, and anyone interested in understanding the complexities of time and simultaneity in relativistic contexts.

  • #61
Trojan666ru said:
This is what we gets from a protons reference frame, both predictions are according to relativity and both are real. But it's a paradox.
In the first event from Earth's rest frame the scientist Robert dies before seeing the proton and in the protons rest frame of reference The scientist is alive!
So how do relativity solve this paradox?
How can MS Diagram can solve this paradox?
I agree they can represent it on a diagram but it doesn't solve the paradox.
If it solves how can i visualize it, i mean i need a picture with definite result, a result that is agreeable for all observers

This is the same as twins paradox. You probably don't see the difference between proton's frame (non-inertial) and planets' frames (inertial).
The best (imo) explanation is here http://www.if.ufrgs.br/oei/santiago/fis02012/FirstCourseGR.pdf on the page 25.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 98 ·
4
Replies
98
Views
8K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 115 ·
4
Replies
115
Views
9K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K