Does a=-g Imply a*x^1=-g*x^2 in Lie 3-Algebras?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Digs
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mean
Digs
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi!

Im messing around with a Lie 3-Algebra at the moment(Im not sure how widespread these are. They obey similar rules to a Lie Algebra).

I have a bracket that looks like this:
[x1,x2,x3]=c*x0+a*x1+g*x2+h*x3, with c,a,g,h, some structure constants.

I also have the relation a=-g.
Am I allowed to then say [x1,x2,x3]=c*x0+a*x2-g*x2+h*x3
or [x1,x2,x3]=c*x0=h*x3?

I suppose my question amounts to does a=-g also mean a*x^1=-g*x^2?

thanks so much
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Digs said:
Hi!

Im messing around with a Lie 3-Algebra at the moment(Im not sure how widespread these are. They obey similar rules to a Lie Algebra).

I have a bracket that looks like this:
[x1,x2,x3]=c*x0+a*x1+g*x2+h*x3, with c,a,g,h, some structure constants.

I also have the relation a=-g.
Am I allowed to then say [x1,x2,x3]=c*x0+a*x2-g*x2+h*x3
Why would you ask? you have replaced x1 by x2 and g by -g. What right do you have to do that?

or [x1,x2,x3]=c*x0=h*x3?

I suppose my question amounts to does a=-g also mean a*x^1=-g*x^2?
No, of course not. Knowing that a=-g tells you nothing about ax1. Knowing that a= -g tells you that ax1= -gx1, not -gx2.

thanks so much
 
in hindsight that was a silly question
thanks for your help though
 
Bumping this for some more structure constant help.
I'm attempting to figure out what a particular Lie 3-algebra is by classifying it's structure constants, which are constrained by what's called the Fundamental Identity(Which is the 3-analog of the Jacobi Identity for normal Lie algebras).

I'm convinced I'm not doing something right as I've actually never computed an algebra this way before(I've only previously studied matrix lie algebras): could someone take a look at my equations?
I've unwound the identity into a system of equations that looks like

1. a=b
2. cd=ea
3. cf=eg
4.cb=eh
5. -g=j
6.ck=la
7.cm=lg
8.cj=lh
9.k=-f
10.ld=ek
11.lf=em
12.lb=ej

where {a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,j,k,l,m} are all 4 indexed structure constants. I was proceeding before trying to divide by various things, but now I've realized that's probably not a legal move as these are indexed objects. Any advice would be wonderful!
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top