Does a photon have energy if its mass is 0?

  • Thread starter Thread starter CallumC
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    E=hf Mass
CallumC
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Ok so the equation E= hf about the energy of a photon, I'm having a problem understanding energies to do with photons.
Since, E=hf
∴ 1/2mv2=hf. But if m=0 how can a photon have energy?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hf is NOT the "kinetic energy" of photons. So you cannot equate things that are different.

Read this FAQ Thread.

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=511175

Zz.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
(1/2)mv^2 doesn't work for energy in relativity. The general relationship between energy, mass and momentum in relativity is

##E^2 = (mc^2)^2 + (pc)^2##

where m is the invariant mass which is sometimes called "rest mass." For photons, m = 0 so E = pc, that is, they can have both energy and momentum even though they don't have ("rest") mass.
 
jtbell said:
where m is the invariant mass which is sometimes called "rest mass." For photons, m = 0 so E = pc, that is, they can have both energy and momentum even though they don't have ("rest") mass.

But if p=mv then are we not back at the same problem, sorry for my ignorance I just wish to understand it.
 
The point is that ##p=mv## does not hold for a massless object. If it would, then ##v=\infty## and we have nonsense. I recommend Giancoli's 6th Edition of Physics for a deeper understanding of Photons.
 
Callum, p=mv is valid in Newtonian physics only (in the form \displaystyle{\vec{p}=m\vec{v}}). You may have seen p=mv with m the so-called <relativistic mass> which is a highly useless and missleading notion, now abandoned even in introductory texts.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top