Does a Rectangle's Area Always Increase with Its Perimeter?

  • Thread starter Thread starter circa415
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculus Geometry
circa415
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
If the perimeter of a rectangle increases, does the area necessarily increase?

Can anyone explain this using calculus?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
No it does not, and you don't need calculus to find the answer:
Let's say you've got a square initially with side "a".
Then, you look at the degenerate rectangle with two sides 3a, and the other two length 0.

The perimeter of the degenerate rectangle is 3a+0+3a+0=6a, that is, greater than your original square's 4a, yet the rectangle's area is zero..
 
Think of a rectangle with corners at (0,0), (0,1/x), (x,1/x), (x,0). Draw a picture-one corner at the origin the opposite on the graph 1/x.

Now we get an entire family of rectangles parameterized by x>0. What can you say about the area of these guys? What about the perimiter as x varies?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top