Does air molecules travel with the same speed as the sound wave?

AI Thread Summary
Sound travels through air at approximately 340 m/s, but air molecules do not travel at this speed. Instead, the average speed of air molecules at around 20°C is about 500 m/s. Sound is propagated by the movement of these air molecules colliding with one another, which facilitates the transmission of the sound wave. Therefore, while sound travels at a specific speed, the individual air molecules move faster on average. Understanding this distinction is crucial in the study of sound propagation.
ap_cycles
Messages
35
Reaction score
1
Hi all,

As sound travels through air, does the air molecules travel with the same speed as well?

In other words, if sound is traveling in air at 340m/s, does it also then mean that the mean speed of all the affected air molecules is 340m/s?

I personally do not think so. I guess that the speed of air molecules will be greater than 340 m/s, but i do not know how to explain. Nor am i totally sure. :redface:

Fellow forummers can help me please?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, the average speed of the air molecules would have to be equal to the speed of sound, as sound is propagated by air molecules moving in the direction of the sound, hitting each other.
 
Average speed of air molecules around 20 C is 500 m/s. The speed of sound is related to the rate of propagation of an impulse wave via collisions.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top