B Does air resistance have a max value?

AI Thread Summary
Air resistance does not have a theoretical maximum value like static friction, but it does reach a limit in free fall known as terminal velocity. This occurs when the gravitational force acting on the object is balanced by the drag force, or air resistance. The drag force is influenced by factors such as the object's shape and orientation, which determine the drag coefficient. In practical terms, the maximum air resistance experienced is equal to the object's weight at terminal velocity. Understanding these dynamics clarifies how objects behave when falling through the atmosphere.
r4g3r4hk
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
I know that friction on a surface has a maximum value. When an object is pushed with a force greater than the maximum friction value, the object will move.
But when a free-falling object falls from a height, does air resistance have a maximum value as well?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
r4g3r4hk said:
I know that friction on a surface has a maximum value. When an object is pushed with a force greater than the maximum friction value, the object will move.
That's an odd way to view it. Static friction is a function of the normal force. There is no theoretical limit, only practical/materials limits.
But when a free-falling object falls from a height, does air resistance have a maximum value as well?
By constraining the scenario to [atmospheric, I assume] free fall, you are defining the drag limit to be equal to the weight of the object.
 
  • Like
Likes Lnewqban and r4g3r4hk
  • Like
Likes Lnewqban, russ_watters and r4g3r4hk
Thanks for the replies! I believe I understand now.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top