B Does air resistance have a max value?

AI Thread Summary
Air resistance does not have a theoretical maximum value like static friction, but it does reach a limit in free fall known as terminal velocity. This occurs when the gravitational force acting on the object is balanced by the drag force, or air resistance. The drag force is influenced by factors such as the object's shape and orientation, which determine the drag coefficient. In practical terms, the maximum air resistance experienced is equal to the object's weight at terminal velocity. Understanding these dynamics clarifies how objects behave when falling through the atmosphere.
r4g3r4hk
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
I know that friction on a surface has a maximum value. When an object is pushed with a force greater than the maximum friction value, the object will move.
But when a free-falling object falls from a height, does air resistance have a maximum value as well?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
r4g3r4hk said:
I know that friction on a surface has a maximum value. When an object is pushed with a force greater than the maximum friction value, the object will move.
That's an odd way to view it. Static friction is a function of the normal force. There is no theoretical limit, only practical/materials limits.
But when a free-falling object falls from a height, does air resistance have a maximum value as well?
By constraining the scenario to [atmospheric, I assume] free fall, you are defining the drag limit to be equal to the weight of the object.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes Lnewqban and r4g3r4hk
Reply
  • Like
Likes Lnewqban, russ_watters and r4g3r4hk
Thanks for the replies! I believe I understand now.
 

Thread 'Is calling fictitious forces "not real" just about terminology?'

Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
View full post »

Thread 'Derivation of Hamilton's Principle: Questions'

I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
View full post »

Similar threads

B Rolling of non-deforming sphere on a non-deforming rough surface?
Replies
4
Views
2K
B Can energy be decomposed?
Replies
2
Views
1K
I Free fall of person in a sled to direct horizontal motion by atmospheric resistance
Replies
12
Views
239
I Drag equation - relative flow velocity
Replies
11
Views
3K
I What friction causes objects to decelerate?
Replies
21
Views
2K
How Does Changing Propeller Weight Affect Max RPM?
Replies
6
Views
2K
B Are frictional forces action forces or reaction forces?
Replies
14
Views
1K
B Air Gun Sighted at a Falling Target Demonstration
Replies
4
Views
2K
Is jumping up in a falling elevator possible?
Replies
25
Views
4K
B Do Objects in Free Fall Encounter Air Resistance?
Replies
10
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top