Does Black Hole Quantum Complexity Challenge Our Understanding of Wormholes?

Justice Hunter
Messages
98
Reaction score
7
Leonard Susskind talks about Black hole Quantum Complexity in one of his online lectures. I was wondering what you guys on the forums think about this, and what you guys think it means.

Here's a link to the video


He points out that the complexity increases linearly with time, and at the point of maximum complexity it cuts off and the singularity stops growing (in complexity). I'm interested in what the implications could be for this abrupt stop in complexity, and what is actually physically happening.
 
  • Like
Likes atyy
Physics news on Phys.org
Asking people to watch an hour video to answer your question is not a great idea. Say where in the lecture the pertinent stuff is.
 
  • Like
Likes Demystifier
Classically the wormhole grows forever, but if the wormhole growth is dual to the growth of complexity in the quantum state then because complexity cannot be too large the classical picture of eternal wormhole growth must also break down.

If the entropy of the black hole is S and we model the system as S qubits then the maximum complexity is of order e^S.

Hence one expects the wormhole to grow for a time exponential in the entropy after which time something should happen. What happens remains mysterious on the gravitational side. It seems that the bulk geometry should in a sense dissolve and become very non-classical, perhaps via some instanton effect?
 
  • Like
Likes Justice Hunter and atyy
We often see discussions about what QM and QFT mean, but hardly anything on just how fundamental they are to much of physics. To rectify that, see the following; https://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/66a6a6005101a2ffa86cdd48/original/a-derivation-of-maxwell-s-equations-from-first-principles.pdf 'Somewhat magically, if one then applies local gauge invariance to the Dirac Lagrangian, a field appears, and from this field it is possible to derive Maxwell’s...
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA

Similar threads

Back
Top