Does Black Hole Quantum Complexity Challenge Our Understanding of Wormholes?

Click For Summary
Leonard Susskind's lecture on Black Hole Quantum Complexity suggests that complexity increases linearly over time, but abruptly stops at maximum complexity, impacting our understanding of wormholes. This implies that the classical model of eternal wormhole growth may be flawed, as it must align with the limitations of quantum complexity. The relationship between black hole entropy and qubits indicates that the maximum complexity is approximately e^S, leading to the expectation of wormhole growth for a time exponential in entropy. However, the subsequent behavior remains unclear, potentially indicating a transition to a non-classical state of the bulk geometry. The implications of this complexity cutoff challenge traditional views of black holes and their associated wormholes.
Justice Hunter
Messages
98
Reaction score
7
Leonard Susskind talks about Black hole Quantum Complexity in one of his online lectures. I was wondering what you guys on the forums think about this, and what you guys think it means.

Here's a link to the video


He points out that the complexity increases linearly with time, and at the point of maximum complexity it cuts off and the singularity stops growing (in complexity). I'm interested in what the implications could be for this abrupt stop in complexity, and what is actually physically happening.
 
  • Like
Likes atyy
Physics news on Phys.org
Asking people to watch an hour video to answer your question is not a great idea. Say where in the lecture the pertinent stuff is.
 
  • Like
Likes Demystifier
Classically the wormhole grows forever, but if the wormhole growth is dual to the growth of complexity in the quantum state then because complexity cannot be too large the classical picture of eternal wormhole growth must also break down.

If the entropy of the black hole is S and we model the system as S qubits then the maximum complexity is of order e^S.

Hence one expects the wormhole to grow for a time exponential in the entropy after which time something should happen. What happens remains mysterious on the gravitational side. It seems that the bulk geometry should in a sense dissolve and become very non-classical, perhaps via some instanton effect?
 
  • Like
Likes Justice Hunter and atyy
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
671
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K