Does Carrying Weight in a Trailer Make Cycling Easier or Harder?

  • Thread starter Thread starter iustin.ouatu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Increasing Mass
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the impact of weight distribution on cycling effort when comparing a bicycle with a 6 kg box versus a cyclist who is 6 kg heavier. It is noted that the coefficient of friction remains the same, but the distribution of weight affects rolling resistance and stability. Carrying weight in a trailer can lower the center of gravity, making the bike more stable and potentially easier to handle. Higher tire pressure in the trailer can reduce rolling resistance, while added weight on the bike can flatten tires, making pedaling more difficult. Ultimately, the way weight is distributed significantly influences the cyclist's effort and comfort.
iustin.ouatu
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello! Yesyerday I saw a bycicle which had attached to its back a box on wheels. Supposing that the coeficient of friction is the same as the coeficient of friction at the surface between bike`s wheels and ground, what of the 2 following cases is worser for the cycler ( he has to make more effort) :
1. The box is 6 kg mass.
2. There is no box and the cycler is heavier than initial with 6 kg.
Thanks you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't see any reason why there should be any difference at all.
 
and/or how the coefficient of friction between wheels and ground comes makes a different...assuming all wheels rotate and non slip...
 
Ok so are we assuming that the total weight in each case is the same but in 1) it's spread over 4 wheels and in 2) it's spread over 2 wheels?

I thought that twice the load on half the number of wheels might give the same rolling resistance... However wikipedia suggests that even if you change tyre pressures rolling resistance isn't directly proportional to load so there might be a small difference.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rolling_resistance#Depends_on_wheel_load
 
I see, so, you are getting real...I was thinking classical physics with rigid bodies (disc wheels) ;-)
 
One advantage of carrying the load in a trailer is that you can arrange for it to be lower to the ground. When you transport extra weight above the rear wheel it makes the bicycle less stable, and with the higher centre of gravity the cyclist has to work harder to keep the bike balanced. You could have higher pressure in the trailer tyres, reducing losses, because you aren't concerned with a comfortable ride for the trailer. When you carry extra weight on the bike the tyre flattens and makes peddling more difficult. To restore a rounder tyre you can pump it harder, but then your ride becomes harsh and uncomfortable (even if the tyre can take the high pressure).
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top