Does climate change affect air density at altitude (scale height)?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the impact of global temperature increases on atmospheric conditions, particularly regarding the tree line and habitability. A specific focus is on how a slight increase in temperature could affect the scale height of the atmosphere, potentially raising it from 8 km to 8.16 km. The conversation also touches on the implications of rising ocean volumes, which could further influence atmospheric height, while noting that warmer sea levels lead to lower air density. The dissolution of gases in oceans at varying temperatures and pH levels is highlighted as a complicating factor. A journal article is referenced that explores these dynamics in relation to aviation, providing equations for calculating pressure and density at different altitudes. The discussion includes a breakdown of these equations, emphasizing the relationships between standard pressure, altimeter settings, airport elevation, and temperature, ultimately aiming to clarify how these factors interact in climate computations.
Mike S.
Messages
90
Reaction score
32
TL;DR Summary
Assume a "worst" case scenario of 6 C global warming. Will the air pressure at high altitudes increase significantly due to a change in scale height of the atmosphere and other factors?
Increases in global temperature change affect the tree line and presumably comfortable habitability via temperature, and average air pressure associated with weather patterns. That's not what I mean. I'm thinking a 1/50 increase in kelvin temperature might increase the scale height of Earth's atmosphere by a comparable factor - from, say, 8 km to 8.16 km. Increases in the volume of the oceans should also push up the atmosphere from below. However, the density of air molecules starts off less because it's hotter at sea level. Then there's the wild card of how much of each gas dissolves into the oceans at different temperatures and pH levels. Has anyone worked through all the angles to determine the net effect on the average of all air density at any given altitude above the geoid?
 
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
Thanks! The equations given in that source are simple but the semantics are unfamiliar to me, so I'll break them down as I go along.

The simplified approximation is:

PA = (P0 - PAltSet) * 1000 + HAirport
DA = PA + 120 (T - Ts)

P0 is "standard pressure" in inHg, which I would *assume* is 29.92 inHg
PAltSet is an "altimeter setting" in inHg ( a pressure reading from a fixed station at the ground read over the radio to the plane, or in this case, just measured at the airport we're talking about, but apparently representing the hypothetical pressure at sea level given current weather conditions)
HAirport is the elevation of the airport in feet
T = Temperature in C, at the airport in this case
Ts = "standard temperature" in C, and Ts = T0 - 0.002 * HAirport. I might *imagine* T0 is 0 or 25, wait no, 15 C?

Reverse engineering their example from Denver, where H = 4226 ft and DA = "roughly" 6350 ft when T = 25 C and PAltSet = 30.01 inHg, I get PA = 4136 ft, Ts = 6.548, and the 120(T-Ts) is 2214, so that adds up. To rephrase these in equations where I'm not guessing random temperature and pressure adding feet and inches of mercury...

PA = (29.92 inHg - PAltSet) * (1000 ft/inHg) + HAirport
DA = PA + (120 ft/C)* (T + 0.002 C/ft * HAirport - 15 C)
DA = PA + (120 ft/C) * T + 0.24 * HAirport - 1800 ft

Combined,
DA = (29.92 inHg - PAltSet) * (1000 ft/inHg) + (120 ft/C) * T + 1.24 * HAirport - 1800 ft

With the units in place, it looks like the ft/inHg and ft/C may both be at issue in climate computations, but at least I've gotten this far. :)
 
On August 10, 2025, there was a massive landslide on the eastern side of Tracy Arm fjord. Although some sources mention 1000 ft tsunami, that height represents the run-up on the sides of the fjord. Technically it was a seiche. Early View of Tracy Arm Landslide Features Tsunami-causing slide was largest in decade, earthquake center finds https://www.gi.alaska.edu/news/tsunami-causing-slide-was-largest-decade-earthquake-center-finds...
Hello, I’m currently writing a series of essays on Pangaea, continental drift, and Earth’s geological cycles. While working on my research, I’ve come across some inconsistencies in the existing theories — for example, why the main pressure seems to have been concentrated in the northern polar regions. So I’m curious: is there any data or evidence suggesting that an external cosmic body (an asteroid, comet, or another massive object) could have influenced Earth’s geology in the distant...

Similar threads

Back
Top