Does CNS in spine have single fiber per inervated muscle?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cave_cat
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fiber Muscle Per
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the neural pathways connecting the brain to specific muscles, particularly in the context of toe movement. It questions whether there is a direct fiber from the brain to the toe or if the central nervous system (CNS) utilizes a multiplexing system to send commands to multiple muscles through shared pathways. It is clarified that there is no single neuron linking the brain to the toe; instead, there is a network of interconnected neurons. Muscle innervation typically follows a straightforward 1:1 connection, while sensory input can involve more complex addressing, leading to phenomena like referred pain. The conversation also touches on variations in neural organization across species, noting that horses have a secondary brain structure in their spinal cord that aids in motor control, and octopuses possess multiple brains for coordinating their limbs. This highlights the complexity of neural communication and the differences in motor control mechanisms across different organisms.
cave_cat
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
if I can move specific muscle in my toe via brain command, does this mean that in spinal cord there is a specific fiber that extends from brain to that toe? And let's say if in a lab rat we cut that single CNS fiber, the muscle affected will stop working without any other consequences to the organism?

Or is this mental model in fact completely wrong so that let's say CNS does time domain multiplexing (or packet addressing? or some other form of multiplexing?), allowing it to send commands to multiple muscles through a single "cable" / fiber?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
There is not a single neuron that goes from the brain to the toe. There is however a group of connected neurons that travel this path. For muscle innervation it's pretty straightforward 1:1 type connections. It gets more tricky for sensory input where you do have "packet addressing". In fact we get errors in addressing sensory information. Probably the easiest example is with referred pain and the best example of that is wit heart attacks (easy to Google). Can't elaborate more right now I'm on my phone and I hate typing on phones!
 
In reference to the specific wording of the original post, it partially depends upon the species. A horse, for instance, has sort of a "second brain" partway along the spinal cord somewhat similar to the way a stegosaurus did. The real brain will send a signal to trot, or walk, or gallup, and the secondary structure takes over sequencing of the motor neurons that control the legs. I'm pretty sure that's why it's so incredibly difficult to make a horse go in reverse; it isn't "hard wired".

edit: I just thought of this now. Even weirder is the octopus. It has 9 brains. Each arm has its own, plus one to coordinate them and take care of macroscopic duties such as logic, respiration and vision.
 
Last edited:
https://www.nhs.uk/mental-health/conditions/body-dysmorphia/ Most people have some mild apprehension about their body, such as one thinks their nose is too big, hair too straight or curvy. At the extreme, cases such as this, are difficult to completely understand. https://www.msn.com/en-ca/health/other/why-would-someone-want-to-amputate-healthy-limbs/ar-AA1MrQK7?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=68ce4014b1fe4953b0b4bd22ef471ab9&ei=78 they feel like they're an amputee in the body of a regular person "For...
Thread 'Did they discover another descendant of homo erectus?'
The study provides critical new insights into the African Humid Period, a time between 14,500 and 5,000 years ago when the Sahara desert was a green savanna, rich in water bodies that facilitated human habitation and the spread of pastoralism. Later aridification turned this region into the world's largest desert. Due to the extreme aridity of the region today, DNA preservation is poor, making this pioneering ancient DNA study all the more significant. Genomic analyses reveal that the...
Whenever these opiods are mentioned they usually mention that e.g. fentanyl is "50 times stronger than heroin" and "100 times stronger than morphine". Now it's nitazene which the public is told is everything from "much stronger than heroin" and "200 times stronger than fentany"! Do these numbers make sense at all? How do they arrive at them? Kill thousands of mice? En passant: nitazene have already been found in both Oxycontin pills and in street "heroin" here, so Naloxone is more...

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
10K
Back
Top