Does Earth's Elliptical Orbit Affect Time Dilation Due to Gravity?

nitsuj
Messages
1,388
Reaction score
98
Relative some arbitrary point in Earth’s orbit around the Sun, does Earth experience varying degrees of time dilation specifically from gravity?

With Earth's orbit around the sun being elliptical I wondered if Earth experiences varying degrees of time dilation caused by the suns gravity (or moon for those cycles).

For example in January we are closest to the sun and farthest in June.

Is time slower in January relative to June.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Generally, the answer to your question is yes, with some caveats and clarifications. First, note that speed varies along the orbit. However, this adds to the gravitational time dilation (faster when closer), so competing effects don't need to be balanced - instead they add to each other. More important, the question really has no meaning without a definition of 'slow relative to what'? Locally, you measure no changes at all.

However, if ones asks what is the total redshift of signals you send, when received by an observer at infinity (assuming asymptotic flatness), you have a well specified question. With this clarification, you could say time on Earth runs slower in January compared to June as perceived by observers at infinity (or, for practical purposes, distant radial observers).
 
Last edited:
I'd like to add one more caveat about this. If you ask about clock time on Earth compared to a single distant clock, the situation is more complex if the distant clock is in the plane of the ecliptic - orbital motion towards and away from that clock would become significant.

So, to get a reasonably simple statement you could say: Compared to a distant clock on a line through the sun, perpendicular to the ecliptic, time on Earth would be slower in January than in June.
 
PAllen said:
I'd like to add one more caveat about this. If you ask about clock time on Earth compared to a single distant clock, the situation is more complex if the distant clock is in the plane of the ecliptic - orbital motion towards and away from that clock would become significant.

So, to get a reasonably simple statement you could say: Compared to a distant clock on a line through the sun, perpendicular to the ecliptic, time on Earth would be slower in January than in June.
So if I get what your saying, I forgot to mention a frame of reference?

What about a ring of clocks, initiated simultaneously, all along Earth's elliptical orbit around the sun, do they all display the same time after a year? (just gravity)
 
Last edited:
nitsuj said:
So if I get what your saying, I forgot to mention a frame of reference?

What about a ring of clocks, initiated simultaneously, all along Earth's elliptical orbit around the sun, do they all display the same time after a year? (just gravity)

Yes, that would just measure gravitational time dilation differences for 'hovering observers' (note these are a special class of non-inertial observers; the orbiting Earth is inertial - excluding its rotation). You would indeed see the clocks at perihelion fall behind the other clocks, with the one at aphelion being most in the lead.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...

Similar threads

Back
Top