Does energy conservation hold if eigen-energies are multiplied by probabilities?

Opi_Phys
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hello,

let us suppose that we have a quantum harmonic oscillator being in the first exciting state. It means that system has some definite energy E_1. Than we change force constant of of the oscillator. As a consequence eigen states and there energy are changed. I think that after this change system cannot be in some new eigen state. Because in this case the system would have some new definite value of energy and we would have contradiction with conservation low. So I conclude that after force constant is changed system will be in some superposition of new eigen states. It means that making measurement we can with some probability find the system in some state having some energy. I have two question. Does the energy conservation low implies that sum of eigen-energies multiplied on the probability to find system in the corresponding state should be equal to the initial energy of the system (e_1*v_1 + e_2*v_2 + ... e_n*v_n = E_1)? Let us suppose that we made measurement and the find system in some new eigen-state with energy e_k. How to be with the conservation low? I mean e_k is not equal to E_1 and it should be a problem?

Opi.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think my questions can be formulated in shorter way:

1. If state of a system is a superposition of the eigen state, how is defined total energy of the system?

2. Should energy conservation low work for this quantum mechanical energy?

3. If energy conservation low is satisfied, is it satisfied statistically (by averaging over many measurements)?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
I am reading WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians. The author states (2.4 Finite versus Continuous Models) that the use of continuity causes the infinities in QFT: 'Mathematicians are trained to think of physical space as R3. But our continuous model of physical space as R3 is of course an idealization, both at the scale of the very large and at the scale of the very small. This idealization has proved to be very powerful, but in the case of Quantum...

Similar threads

Back
Top