Does Every Point of R Exist as an Accumulation Point in a Sequence?

AI Thread Summary
A sequence can be constructed where every point in the real numbers R is an accumulation point, particularly using the set of rational numbers, which are dense in R. The discussion highlights that rational numbers can be enumerated due to their countability, supporting the idea that they can serve as accumulation points for every real number. Additionally, the Heine-Borel Theorem is illustrated by showing that a non-closed bounded set, such as the open interval (-1, 1), can be covered by an open cover that lacks a finite sub-cover. This leads to a contradiction, emphasizing the necessity of closed sets in the theorem. Understanding these concepts is crucial for deeper insights into real analysis.
Kraziethuy
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
1.Does a sequence exist that has every point of R(real numbers) as an accumulation point?

2.Show that closed is essential in the Heine-Borel Theorem by finding an open cover of a non-closed bounded set that does not have a finite sub-cover.

I think that the set of rational numbers has every real numbers as an accumulation point, but I'm unsure of the sequence of rational numbers.

Any help appreciated, thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think that the set of rational numbers has every real numbers as an accumulation point, but I'm unsure of the sequence of rational numbers.

You have the right idea. A potentially unsatisfying answer might be to simply enumerate the rational numbers (which is possible because they are countable).
Alternatively, are you familiar with Hilbert's hotel and the proof that the rational numbers are countable?
 
For Q2, just consider the open interval of (-1, 1) in R. Consider an open cover like the collection of intervals, { (x-w, x+w), w=(1-|x|)/2: x from (-1, 1) }. If this collection has a finite subcover, would there be any points not covered by the subcovering (and thus a contradiction)?
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top