Does every uncountable set of reals contain an interval?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dreamtheater
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Interval Set
dreamtheater
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Let S be an uncountable subset of the reals.

Then does S always contain at least one interval (whether it be open/closed/half-open/rays/etc..)?

Maybe the Cantor set is an example of an uncountable set that contains no intervals? How does one show this if it is true?

My intuition is that, if any subset of the reals contains no intervals, then it must be denumerable, but this might be wrong.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
dreamtheater said:
Let S be an uncountable subset of the reals.

Then does S always contain at least one interval (whether it be open/closed/half-open/rays/etc..)?

Maybe the Cantor set is an example of an uncountable set that contains no intervals? How does one show this if it is true?

My intuition is that, if any subset of the reals contains no intervals, then it must be denumerable, but this might be wrong.

Consider the set of all irrational numbers.
 
False!
The Cantor, the irrationals, and the transendential numbers are obvious counter examples.
 
dreamtheater said:
Maybe the Cantor set is an example of an uncountable set that contains no intervals? How does one show this if it is true?
Take any interval. It has length d. But for sufficiently high n, 3^{-n} < d. Therefore, by construction, the Cantor set contains no intervals of length d.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top